M-TH: U.S. out of Iraq 

Charles Brown marxism-thaxis <mailto:marxism-thaxis> 
Tue, 30 Mar 1999 09:53:05 -0500 

*       Previous message: M-TH: Fw: (long) ANTI-FASCIST ACTION ALERT #67:
PROTEST U.S. BOMBING OF YUGOSLAVIA
<http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism-thaxis/1999-March/014221.html>

*       Next message: M-TH: Fwd: [BRC-NEWS] "When I Grow Up..."
<http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism-thaxis/1999-March/014222.html>

*       Messages sorted by: [ date ]
<http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism-thaxis/1999-March/date.html#14
220>  [ thread ]
<http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism-thaxis/1999-March/thread.html#
14220>  [ subject ]
<http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism-thaxis/1999-March/subject.html
#14220>  [ author ]
<http://lists.econ.utah.edu/pipermail/marxism-thaxis/1999-March/author.html#
14220>  

________________________________

An old article, still pertinent.

CB

((((((((((((((((((((((((

THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF U.S. TERROR BOMBING
How Washington Perfected Hitler's Schrecklichkeit
Workers Vanguard, March 1, 1991


Video images of laser-guided 'smart" bombs homing in on their targets,
generals talking of "precision bombing," vague references to "collateral
damage": the Pentagon has worked up A cult of high-tech as Washington's
propaganda machine is spreading the lie that the U.S. air assault against
Iraq is a "clean" war. And meanwhile Iraqi civilians are deliberately
incinerated in a bomb shelter in Baghdad. The roads of Iraq have become
killing fields, lined with the bombed-out wreckage of cars and trucks. In
two recent atrocities, bombers targeted buses loaded with civilians,
killing a total of 60 people. The "surgical strikes" are hitting hospitals
where doctors perform surgery on mutilated women and children.

The orgy of destruction has leveled power plants, factories, warehouses,
bridges, roads, phone installations-the entire infrastructure of the
country. The city of Basra in southern Iraq, which has been singled out for
special devastation, was simply declared by U.S. military authorities to be
a "military town." Pentagon spokesmen classify any civilian target hit as
"dual purpose," both military and civilian. According to our estimate the
U.S. is dropping at least 16,000 tons of bombs a day, so after 40 days of
air war, with 100,000 sorties flown, the U.S. has dropped on Iraq almost a
quarter of the total tonnage dropped by all the belligerent powers in World
War II!

Uneasy with the "bad press" that the bombing of civilians is getting, the
New York Times (14 February) asked plaintively: "Why not stop bombing
cities?"

Liberals have often sought to distance themselves from the policy of
strategic bombing, arguing that in any case it is "ineffective" in
destroying a country's ability to wage war. This is the argument of
economist John Kenneth Galbraith, who headed the U.S. Strategic Bombing
Survey in World War II. Galbraith writes that his study showed, "Germany's
industrial production-weapons and munitions, in particular-continued to
increase, with no visible halt until nearly the end of the war" (Los
Angeles Times, 10 February).

What Galbraith leaves unsaid is that the nose dive in production in those
final months was because of the mass terror bombing campaign which
deliberately targeted and massacred hundreds of thousands of industrial
workers.

Colonel Harry Summers Jr., the Vietnam War historian and former professor
of strategy at the Army War College, was blunter. In a column titled
"'Collateral Damage' a Familiar, Often Intended, Part of War" (Los Angeles
Times, 8 February), Summers noted that the deliberate targeting of the
civilian population in order to break the will to resist "didn't start with
'We had to destroy the town in order to save it,' the unfortunate remark of
the young Army officer in the Mekong Delta during the Vietnam war...." The
carpetbombing of Vietnam only continued the U.S. forces' "scorched earth"
policy in Korea, the firebombing campaign in Germany and Japan and-the
A-bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

In our last issue ("Terror Bombing Has Not Broken Iraq," WV No. 520, 15
February) we noted that "in World War 11 Hitler adopted a policy of
Schrecklichkeit, deliberate terrorizing of the 'enemy' population," but
"the Allies outdid the Nazis in this department." The "democratic"
imperialists in fact had a preference for mass slaughter through air power,
which kept the horrendous casualties at a distance.

The Allies pursued the policy of mass terror bombing of civilians with
increasing ferocity throughout World War 11, raising it to unspeakable
dimensions. Hamburg, Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima and Nagasaki are among the
many cities which were transformed into fiery crematoriums for their
working populations. In Germany, Allied bombers deliberately massacred some
600,000 civilians; in Japan hundreds of thousands died under U.S. bombs. In
sum, almost one million civilians were deliberately massacred by Allied
terror bombing.

Schrecklichkeit U.S.-Style

In the Dictionary of Historical Terms (1983) by Chris Cook, Schrecklichkeit
is defined as the "deliberate policy of committing atrocities to subdue a
subject people." Louis L. Snyder's Historical Guide to World War 11 (1982)
writes that "The bombing of Warsaw early in the war made it clear to the
Allies how Hitler intended to fight his war. It was to be Schrecklichkeit
('frightfulness') with no regard for the civilian population." The
Luftwaffe began the Blitzkrieg (lightning war) by destroying the Polish Air
Force on the ground, and for six days 400 German bombers. battered the city
day and night.

The next year, the Germans put an end to the Sitzkrieg (sitting war), the
period of inactivity on the Western Front between September 1939 and May
1940 called the "phony war" in. English, by employing the same policy
against the Dutch port of Rotterdam. In an act of gratuitous cruelty (the
city had already surrendered), Stuka dive-bombers leveled the center of the
city. In repeated attacks on London's civilian population througbout 1940,
German bombers killed some 30,000 people as they tried to bomb the':
population into submission I I Later that same year, when Hitler's plans
for an invasion of Britain were frustrated, he, took out his revenge on,
the city of Coventry, killing over 500 people in a ten-hour bombing raid.

The policy of terror bombing civilians in order to undermine the ability to
wage war was first systematically developed by the Italian general Giulio
Douhet. His ideas on air war had a decisive influence in shaping American
military doctrine. Colonel Summers refers to Douhet's 1921 treatise, The
Command of the Air, reprinted by the U.S. Office of Air Force. History in
1983, as a "masterwork." And a recent U.S. Air Force publication calls him
a "prophet of the air" (Thomas Greer, The Development of Air Doctrine in
the Army Air Arm 1917-1941 [1985]). What they fail to mention is that this
"prophet" was commissioner of aviation in Mussolini's fascist regime. Here
is Douhet's strategy for waging air war:

"What civil or military authority could keep order, public services
functioning, and production going under such a threat'? And even if a
semblance of order was maintained and some work done, would not the sight
of a single enemy plane be enough to stampede the population into panic? In
short, normal life would be impossible in this constant nightmare of
imminent death and destruction....
"A complete breakdown of the social structure cannot but take place in a
country subjected to this kind of merciless pounding from the air. The time
would soon come when, to put an end to horror and suffering, the people
themselves, driven by the instinct of self-preservation, would rise up and
demand an end to the war."
-quoted in Edward Earle, ed., Makers of Modern Strategy: Military Thought
from    Machiavelli to Hiller (1952)

>From the start, U.S. air commanders embraced Douhet's policy of terror
bombing as a way to limit their casualties and win wars "on the cheap." His
ideas were taken up almost word for word - and rendered even more brutal -
by "Billy" Mitchell, one of the first chiefs of the U.S. air service in the
'20s. Mitchell wrote that instead of destroying cities it might be
preferable to eliminate the civilian population with "a few gas bombs."
Decades later, this same concept was behind the neutron bomb, a
particularly "dirty" nuclear device designed to maximize deaths through
radiation and minimize bomb blast damage to structures.

Douhet's doctrine was incorporated in the official Air Force textbook used
until World War 11 which, according to Greer's official Air Force history,
"established national morale and industry as more crucial objectives than
enemy armies. The easiest and cheapest way to win a war was thought to be
by air attack upon the enemy's population and production facilities."
Military historian John Keegan correctly pointed out that this policy
"depended ultimately upon class bias-the judgment that the latent
discontents of the proletariat were the Achilles heel of an industrial
state" (The Second World War [19891).

Class hatred of the industrial proletariat is so pervasive in the documents
of Allied military and political leaders that it is impossible to cite more
than a fraction of the documents which explicitly affirm that the target of
strategic bombing was to be the workers themselves. The future British
chief of air staff John Slessor summed it up with imperial snideness:

"in air operations against production the weight of attack will inevitably
fall upon a vitally important, and not by nature very amenable, section of
the community-the industrial workers, whose morale and sticking power
cannot be expected to equal that of the disciplined soldier."
-quoted in Max Hastings, Bomber Command (1979)

And the official British history of the air war cites the February 1942
bombing directive which notes that the "primary object" of the bombing
"should now be focused on the morale of the enemy civil population and in
particular, of the industrial workers" (see Charles Webster and Noble
Frankland, The Strategic, Air Offensive Against Germany: 1939-1945 [196
11). There is a widespread myth -that,unlike the British who engaged in
indiscriminate "area" bombing against civilians, the U.S. carried out
"precision" bombing against military and industrial targets. This myth is
rooted in what was essentially a division of labor between the two Allied
imperialist powers. The British, saddled with antiquated bombers and
without long-range fighter protection, were forced to limit themselves to
night; raids. Their notorious inaccuracy is highlighted in Len Deighton's
novel, Bomber, which details the horrendous destruction inflicted on a
German town by British bombers who got lost on a night. raid.

One could hardly pretend that these raids were anything but indiscriminate
terror directed against civilians, and British military leaders openly
extolled the supposed efficacy of mass terror bombing. U.S. bombers, less
vulnerable and (starting in early 1944) protected by a fleet of long-range
fighters, were able to carry out daylight bombing raids. Drawing German
fighters into a headto-head air war of attrition, they eventually depleted
Germany's home defenses (while most of the Luftwaffe was on the Eastern
Front facing the Soviet Army). This permitted the Allies toward the end of
the war to bomb German cities with virtual impunity.

Most often it made scarcely any difference to those on the ground whether
they were being subjected to U.S. "precision" bombing or British "area"
bombing, since most U.S. bombs missed their assigned targets anyway and
fell on surrounding working-class residential areas. Then as today, U.S.
commanders generated a cult of high-tech arms, claiming that U.S. bombers
equipped with the "top secret" Norden bomb sight could drop a bomb "into a
pickle barrel." In reality, an estimated one-half of U.S. bombs were
dropped through cloud cover or at night where the average bombing error was
about three miles off target. And of those bombs dropped in daylight under
clear conditions, at most half fell within onequarter mile of the target
point (John Ellis, Brute Force: Allied Strategy and Tactics in the Second
World War [1990].
The myth that U.S. air strikes did not target civilians has been reinforced
by a concerted whitewash by U.S. officials which started during World War
11, keeping military memos "clean" of any hint of targeting civilians. In
an important study, historian Ronald Schaffer notes:

"High-ranking officers sent official messages to one another which caused
the record to suggest that AAF [Army Air Forces] practice fitted with the
official policy. Yet these officers knew this was not the case.... [U.S.
deputy air commander] Anderson and his colleagues were protecting the image
of the AAF from historians and other investigators." -"American Military
Ethics in World War II, The Bombing of German Civilians," Journal of
American History, September 1980

Schaffer reveals that when the British and U.S. Combined Chiefs of Staff
met to approve the terror bombing attacks on Berlin, Dresden and other
cities, FDR's representative intervened to advise not to "record" such a
decision.

This concern for prettifying the historical record was the. cause of a
cynical "doublespeak" in U.S. military documents. After preparing a series
of daylight raids with incendiary bombs against .densely built-up sections
of German cities, U.S. commander Arnold informed the Air Staff in
Washington: .'the way to stop the killing of civilians is to cause so much
damage and destruction and deaththat the civilians will demand that their
government cease fighting. This doesn't mean that we are making civilians
or civilian institutions a war objective...."

Favorably contrasting U.S. military censorship in World War 11 with the
Pentagon's "arrogant" but "so far successful" control of the press in the
Persian Gulf War, Walter Cronkite wrote that army censors in Britain "held
up my report that the Eighth Air Force had bombed Germany through a solid
cloud cover," since supposedly "we were practicing only precision bombing
on military targets." The Luftwaffe knew the reality, Cronkite pointed out:
"The truth was not being withheld from Germans but Americans" (Newsweek, 25
February).

Incinerating the German Proletariat

in their drive to raze entire cities, the Allies eventually succeeded in
provoking through incendiary bombing a horrible new phenomenon in warfare,
the firestorm. They discovered that by concentrating sufficient fire in one
area they could create an infernal microclimate in which an entire city was
transformed into a blast furnace, enormously multiplying the bombs'
murderous effects. The areas which were chosen for immolation were
invariably the working-class districts.

The first firestorm took place in Hamburg, which the Allies bombed in July
1943, targeting the most heavily built-up and densely populated area. As in
subsequent firebombings, both incendiary and high-explosive bombs were
dropped; the latter were used to destroy metallic roofs and windows and
expose the building interiors to the conflagration: "People died within
seconds of being subjected to the unimaginable heat, dying from oxygenlack,
carbon monoxide poisoning, even incandescence" (Chaz Bowyer, Air War Over
Europe [1981].. Some 50,000 civilians died in Hamburg. In the civilian bomb
shelters the intense heat melted metal pots and pans. Photos taken when the
shelters were opened show piles of grey ash outlining where the bodies had
lain.

Allied bombers continued to wage an escalating war of extermination against
Germany's cities. Toward the fall of 1944, as the Allies achieved supremacy
in the skies over Germany and could concentrate their fire undeterred, they
succeeded with regularity in provoking firestorms - in Kassel, Würzburg,
Darmstadt, Heilbronn, Wuppertal, Weser, Magdeburg, and culminating in the
incredible butchery of Dresden. The Allies experimented on the best way to
provoke the desired effect. Different bombing patterns were tried to give
the deadliest concentration of incendiary bombs (the optimum was found to
be a "fan" pattern which was then used on Dresden).

The Allies' firebombing of Dresden was the most terrible of all air raids
on Germany - possibly the greatest single massacre in history. Prime
Minister Winston Churchill berated British air minister Archibald Sinclair
to get him to target' "Berlin, and no doubt other large cities in East
Germany." In February 1945 British bombers, virtually unhindered by
fighters or antiaircraft fire, dropped thousands of blast bombs and almost
650,000 incendiaries on Dresden, provoking a firestorm which was visible
for200 miles. The next morning 300 U.S. bombers blasted the still-burning
city through the smoke and cloud cover (U.S. authorities would later
present this as "precision" bombing of the rail yards). Escorting U.S.
fighters strafed bombed-out survivors huddled on the banks of the Elbe.

The horrendous level of civilian casualties has been a subject of
controversy for years. The city was swollen to twice its peacetime size by
refugees fleeing fighting in the East, and these were concentrated in the
railway terminal area which was ground zero for the bombs. For many years
the figure of 225,000 was the standard estimate of the number of dead. The
Americans and British have tried to reduce the figure to 60,000, which is
absurdly low, while "the German Federal Bureau of Statistics in Wiesbaden
claims that it was 600,000" (Janusz Piekalkiewicz, The Air War: 1939-1945
[1985]).

The grisly destruction of Dresden (which contained no important military or
even industrial targets) provoked a wave of revulsion. In response to an AP
story on "deliberate terror bombing," U.S. air commanders, after
consultation with General Eisenhower, issued guidelines for officers on how
to answer questions:

"A. That there has been no change in bombing policy;

"B. The United States Strategic Air Forces have always directed their
attacks against military objectives and will continue to do so;

"C. The story was erroneously passed by censor."

Identical guidelines must have been issued by the Pentagon "spin doctors"
on how to respond over the criminal U.S. bombing of the Baghdad shelter.

Histories of the air war in Europe generally explain the destruction of
Dresden as an effort to facilitate the Soviet advance by blocking German
reinforcements headed to the Eastern Front. In reality, the reason for
extending the campaign of terror bombings to Dresden and other cities in
eastern Germany was, as General David Schlatter, Eisenhower's deputy chief
of air staff, noted at the time in his diary:

"I feel that our air forces are the blue chips with which we will approach
the post-war treaty table, and that this operation will add immeasurably to
their strength, or rather to the Russian knowledge of their strength."

Firebombing and A-Bombing Japan

At the very moment that American authorities were cynically denying wanton
attacks on civilians in Dresden, they were preparing for the firebombing of
Tokyo and other Japanese cities. In the hysterical climate of anti-Japanese
racism, U.S. officials felt less compunction than in Germany to camouflage
the massacres. U.S. bombers launched massive firebomb raids on Tokyo,
Osaka, Kobe and Nagoya, destroying a total built-up, area of 50, miles
square. The most horrendous bloodletting came in Tokyo where in a single
raid in March 1945 some 100,000 people perished as "canals boiled, metal
melted, and buildings and human beings burst spontaneously into flames"
(John Dower, War Without Mercy: Race & Power in the Pacific War [1986]).

By August 1945 fully 58 cities had been destroyed by firebombing. General
Curtis LeMay, who commanded the raids, was forced to temporarily check his
bloodlust after three weeks because he had run out of his entire supply of
10,000 tons of incendiary bombs. This was the same LeMay who as head of the
Air Force at the outset of the Vietnam War called for bombing Vietnam "back
to the Stone Age." In their savage attempt to crush a social revolution,
they dropped unthinkable quantities. of napalm, cluster bombs and high
explosives, carpetbombing from Saigon to Hanoibefore they were driven out
by the heroic Vietnamese workers and peasants.

On 6 August 1945 the- U.S. dropped. the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and,
three days later, on Nagasaki, slaughtering over 200,000 people. Untold
thousands were left suffering from excruciating bums, radiation sickness
and genetic defects. In choosing these cities, Secretary of War Henry
Stimson said there

,..Should be a "war plant employing a large number of workers closely
surrounded by workers' houses" (see our article "Racism, Anti-Sovietism and
Atomic Holocaust," WV No. 459, 12 August 1988). In addition to the Japanese
working people killed at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, over 10,000 Korean - and
many Chinese forced laborers died. Yet President Truman cynically claimed
that Hiroshima was a "military base" which was targeted "because we wished
in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of
civilians" (Truman Speaks [1960]).

As we wrote a decade ago:

"With racist calculation the already defeated Japanese were chosen as the
human testing ground to prove to American imperialism's opponentsespecially
the USSR-that the USA will stop at nothing to maintain world domination."
-"Hiroshima Day: To Remember Is Not Enough!" WV No. 263, 5 September 1980

Air War Against the Workers

World War II closed as it had opened with the indiscriminate bombardment of
civilians, but the bourgeoisie had pushed its criminal massacres to a truly
monstrous scale. The 1937 terror bombing of Manchuria by the Japanese and
the German blitz of Coventry and London were among the war crimes for which
Japanese and German leaders were executed by the victorious Allies. (The
latter were considerably less offended when German bombers sowed terror in
Spain while fighting in support of Franco-the horror of which was captured
in Picasso's mural Guernica.) Rarely has the stark hypocrisy,of the
bourgeoisie been morepatent. Allied prosecutors sat amid the ruins of
Nuremberg and Tokyo as they condemned their vanquished foe for killing
"men, women and children alike."

In reality, all the imperialist bourgeoisies had seized upon air power,
from the earliest days of its development, as an effective instrument of
mass terror for keeping their subject peoples in place. From the early
'20s, the British used frequent air strikes in Iraq to terrorize rebellious
Kurds and others. In India, British bombers killed thousands in smashing
the 1942 "Quit India" movement. The French sent their bombers against
Damascus in 19-26 to crush a nationalist revolt. In 1945 they massacred
tens of thousands of Algerians as an incipient colonial revolt was drowned
in blood. The Italians used the horrors of aerial bombardment in the '30s
in conquering Ethiopia.

The U.S. bourgeoisie distinguished itself by carrying out terror bombing
against its own population,, against black people. In May 1921, in Tulsa,
Oklahoma a group of 75 armed blacks showed up at a jail to defend a young
black man (arrested after falling against a, white woman) from a lynch mob.
A report at the time describes how "the, white mobs, numbering by then
more, than 10,000, invaded the negro section, the colored men resisting
determinedly" (Literary Digest, 18 June 1921). The heart of the segregated
black community of Tulsa was set on fire and allowed to burn to the ground
as police dropped dynamite from commandeered private planes against blacks
who had taken up arms to defend themselves against white racists. Dozens of
people were killed, mostly blacks, and thousands of blacks were locked up
in concentration camps (see "The Day They Bombed Blacks in Tulsa," WV No.
380, 31 May 1985).

And then, six years ago, on 13 May 1985 the home of Philadelphia MOVE was
bombed from the air by a police helicopter, with the approval of black
Democrat mayor Wilson Goode and the aid of U.S.. officials going right up
to Ronald Reagan's White House. The resulting fire incinerated five black
children and six black men and women and destroyed entire blocks of the
black neighborhood. This heinous crime, symbol of the harsh brutality of
the Reagan years, was intended to be a threatening message to blacks,
workers and. all oppressed (see "Philly Inferno, Racist Murder!" WV No.
380, 31 May 1985).

>From the time it was developed, air power has had a special attraction for
the bourgeoisie as a weapon which can inflict unimaginable devastation at a
distance, anonymously, and "on the cheap." And the principal victims have
always been the workers, oppressed minorities and colonial peoples.
Historian John Keegan quotes British military strategist B.H. Liddell. Hart
to the effect that bombing attacks would provoke "the slum districts
maddened into the impulse to break loose and maraud." The aim was to
"stampede" the working people into rising up against their rulers, as
General Douhet advocated. This reflected, wrote Keegan, "the ruling
classes' prevailing fear of insurrection, perhaps leading to revolution,
which the success of the Bolsheviks in war-torn Russia had rekindled
throughout Europe after 1917" (The Second World War).

Certainly the bourgeoisie expected its bombing campaign to provoke chaos
and social breakdown-in their class-limited view, this is no doubt how they
summed up the Bolshevik Revolution. But sheer terrorization of the
population does not lead to rebellion, nor did the terror bombing by either
imperialist coalition in World War II succeed in breaking civilian will to
fight. Allied "strategic bombing" didn't work in Germany, The 900-day-long
German siege of Leningrad, reducing the population to starvation, didn't
break the will of the people of Leningrad, who rose fiercely to defend the
gains of their revolution against the Nazi invaders. And in the extreme
case of the Jewish ghettos of East Europe, Hitler's genocidal. destruction
inspired the relative few who survived to become hardened, heroic fighters
against the Third Reich.

As the U.S. imperialists rain hideous death and destruction on the working
people of Iraq, we Trotskyists reaffirm our dedication to leading a true
Bolshevik Revolution-to working-class power-which can put an end to
imperialism and its ghastly wars.





_______________________________________________
Marxism-Thaxis mailing list
Marxism-Thaxis@lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/marxism-thaxis

Reply via email to