g, that he can
be interpreted in all sorts of different ways.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Charles Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Sep 12, 2005 12:55 PM
> To: 'Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl
> Marx and
> the thinkers he inspi
Ralph D:
I'm no Rousseau expert, but this doesn't sound right to me. The Rousseau
quote in itself seems to be a quintessentially dialectical statement: how is
it that a human being born a tabula rasa (socially if not genetically), who
has the potential to become anything, is then socialized in a s
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:55:03 -0400 "Charles Brown"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
> excerpt from
> Liberty
> A study in bourgeois illusion
Caudwell seems to have held to a type of compatibilism
concerning the issue of free will and determinism.
As such it seems to bear more than a passing
r
: Charles Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sep 12, 2005 12:55 PM
To: 'Forum for the discussion of theoretical issues raised by Karl Marx and
the thinkers he inspired'
Subject: [Marxism-Thaxis] that man (sic) was born free, but was crippled
through social organisation.
excerpt from
Liberty
A study in bourgeois illusion
>From this it follows that the animals are less free than men. Creatures of
impulse, acting they know not why, subject to all the chances of nature, of
other animals, of geographical accidents and climatic change, they are at
the mercy of ne
