'Compton Executioners' deputy gang lied about guns and hosted inking parties, 
deputy says

A Compton station tattoo.

(Sweeney Firm /Glickman & Glickman)

By Alene Tchekmedyian ( https://www.latimes.com/people/alene-tchekmedyian ) 
Staff Writer

https://www.latimes.com/ california/story/2020-08-20/ lasd-gangs-who-are-the- 
compton-executioners ( 
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-20/lasd-gangs-who-are-the-compton-executioners
 )

Aug. 20, 2020

5:50 PM

UPDATEDAug. 21, 2020 | 6:34 PM

At the Compton sheriff’s station, ( 
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-07-30/sheriff-clique-compton-station-executioners
 ) it’s called a ghost gun: a weapon a deputy says he spots on a suspect but 
that is never found when colleagues respond to the scene and search for it.

That’s because the call-out is based on a lie. The deputy didn’t actually see a 
gun, but his suspect could turn out to be armed and an arrest or recovered 
firearm could pad his reputation.

It’s the kind of behavior that plays out regularly at the station, ( 
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-fbi-investigating-sheriff-20190711-story.html
 ) according to a whistleblower who worked there for five years and recounted 
other sensational allegations in a recent deposition obtained by The Times in a 
federal civil rights lawsuit.

“In reality, they’ve never seen the gun,” L.A. County Sheriff’s Deputy 
Austreberto Gonzalez said under oath. “And then at the end when their 
containments are set up, you know, the gun is never recovered. You know, 
they’ll call it a day and say, ‘Thank you for rolling. We’re going to call it,’ 
and a gun was never recovered.”

Gonzalez says the scheme is employed in Compton by tattooed deputies who call 
themselves the Executioners, the clandestine gang many say runs the station.

His allegations add to a growing body of information about the Compton clique, 
one of several tattooed deputy groups within the Sheriff’s Department with 
names such as the Grim Reapers, Banditos and Jump Out Boys. ( 
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-13/villanueva-banditos-deputies
 )

The Sheriff’s Department has been aware of the groups for decades but has 
struggled to crack down, despite repeated internal and independent 
investigations and instances i n which members are accused of misconduct. ( 
https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-04/sheriff-deputy-clique-payouts
 )

Gonzalez’s statements were introduced in an excessive-force lawsuit filed 
against the Sheriff’s Department by Sheldon Lockett. The judge hearing the case 
cited the evidence when tentatively deciding to advance the case for trial.

“ *Accepting the deputy’s testimony, there is evidence that the clique existed 
in Compton and that it routinely violated the rights of suspects,”* Magistrate 
Judge Patrick J. Walsh said in his ruling. “The testimony also establishes that 
the command staff at the station knew about it and not only did not stop it but 
it encouraged the behavior and placed its members in positions of authority 
where they could help other members.”

The Sheriff’s Department said the FBI is now involved in an investigation of 
the Executioners. ( 
https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-sheriff-tattoo-settlement-20190618-story.html
 ) Following The Times’ reporting, Compton officials issued formal requests to 
the state and federal attorney generals to investigate allegations of pervasive 
civil rights violations.

In his deposition, Gonzalez identified Miguel Vega, the Compton station deputy 
who killed 18-year-old Andres Guardado in a shooting in June that sparked weeks 
of protests, and his partner, Chris Hernandez, as prospective members of the 
Executioners. Their attorneys said Wednesday that those allegations are false.

“Deputy Vega does not have one single tattoo on his body, much less a deputy 
gang tattoo,” his attorney Adam Marangell said. “He doesn’t have one, nor does 
he plan on getting one.”

The Sheriff’s Department said in a statement that it had not yet received the 
transcript of Gonzalez’s testimony. “Once we do, counsel will review and we can 
respond appropriately,” a spokesman said. County attorneys have argued that 
Gonzalez’s testimony about the Executioners was nothing more than speculation 
and conjecture, as he’s not in the group and has no personal knowledge about it.

Lockett alleges he was targeted by deputies “chasing ink” when he was beaten 
and falsely arrested for attempted murder in 2016, his attorneys said. He sued 
in 2018.

Deputies that day pulled up to Lockett outside his godmother’s home and jumped 
out of their car with their guns drawn because they said he matched the 
description of a shooting suspect. Lockett froze, then ran. The deputies, 
Samuel Aldama and Mizrain Orrego, radioed that Lockett had a gun, which he says 
was a lie. No gun was found.

They chased him until they found him hiding in a backyard, where Lockett says 
he surrendered. Even so, he says, Aldama punched him in the head five times 
while using the N-word. He alleged that one of the deputies rammed the end of a 
police baton into his eye socket, which caused permanent damage, and that he 
was kicked in the back of the head. The county has denied the allegations.

Lockett was arrested on suspicion of attempted murder and other gun charges and 
spent eight months in jail. In August, prosecutors dropped charges because of 
insufficient evidence and after a witness testified that she was mistaken when 
she identified him, according to a district attorney’s office spokeswoman.

After the arrest, Lockett’s mother filed a complaint to the Sheriff’s 
Department.

“They did nothing,” Lockett’s attorney John Sweeney said during a hearing this 
week. Instead, he says, they served a search warrant on her home in 
retaliation. Several months after Lockett’s arrest and three weeks after 
charges were dropped, Aldama and Orrego shot at and killed Donta Taylor, 31, 
during a foot chase. Deputies said Taylor had a handgun, but no weapon was 
found.

“Had that been investigated ... Donta Taylor would still be alive,” Sweeney 
said. “This was nothing more than a sport kill and an attempt to getting into 
this gang. And instead of being prosecuted, what happened? There were inking 
parties and celebrations.”

Aldama admitted under oath to having a tattoo on his calf depicting a skull 
with a rifle and a military-style helmet emerging from flames. The letters 
“CPT,” for Compton, appear on the helmet. Aldama said he was one of as many as 
20 deputies selected to get the same tattoo after “working hard” by making 
arrests and answering calls. He denied being part of a club.

L.A. County settled a lawsuit brought by Taylor’s family for $7 million. 
Deputies with alleged ties to these cliques, which are accused of using violent 
and aggressive tactics similar to those of criminal street gangs, have cost 
taxpayers $55 million in settlements and payouts in incidents that date to the 
1990s, according to county records obtained by The Times.

Walsh said three Compton deputies, including Aldama and Orrego, have denied in 
other court proceedings that they were part of a clique and attributed their 
matching tattoos to “serendipity.”

The depositions of those three deputies are under seal, but Lockett’s attorney 
Steven Glickman argued during a court hearing Thursday that their tattoos are 
numbered. In their depositions, Glickman said Aldama testified that his 
tattoo’s No. 38 was a nod to his first gun; Orrego’s said his tattoo, which was 
covered up, was never numbered and he got it in solidarity with Aldama, his 
friend who had cancer; and Deputy Rogelio Benzor’s tattoo has a No. 40, which 
he explained as a reference to his retirement in 2040.

The county had argued that Lockett’s attorneys failed to produce evidence that 
there was a clique and show that the county knew about it.

“ *Obviously, these rogue officers are not going to simply admit that they had 
formed an unlawful group bent on assaulting minorities,” the judge wrote.* 
“And, presumably, the clique would not be issuing membership cards, or taking 
minutes at membership meetings, or doing anything else that normal, lawful 
organizations do. Thus, it would seem impossible for a plaintiff to find 
tangible evidence to prove that the officers were lying when they denied the 
existence of their group.”

Just last week, Sheriff Alex Villanueva said he was moving to discipline 26 
employees with firings or suspensions for their roles in a fight at an off-duty 
East L.A. station party at Kennedy Hall, a nearby event space, where *deputies 
say they were attacked by inked members of the Banditos,* who allegedly 
*wielded power at the station*. But he denied that gangs exist within the 
Sheriff’s Department.

“There is zero evidence of three or more deputies engaged in criminal activity 
with a unifying symbol whose primary purpose is to commit crime,” Villanueva 
said.

Two deputies who said they were assaulted and knocked unconscious are among 
those facing discipline for policy violations that include failing to report 
the Kennedy Hall incident to superiors, their attorney Vincent Miller said.

“ *My guys are in trouble for not reporting the Banditos to the Banditos,”* 
Miller said, adding that his clients did report the incident right away to a 
lieutenant they trusted.

Prosecutors declined to file criminal charges against the deputies who Miller 
says attacked his clients. But an administrative investigation found that some 
*employees at the East L.A. station were acting as so-called shot callers* , 
controlling scheduling and events at the station, Cmdr. April Tardy said, using 
a term often used to describe top leaders in prisons and gangs.

In *Compton, the Executioners ruled* the station using a similar structure, 
Gonzalez testified. About 15 to 20 deputies are Executioners, he said, and at 
least a handful more are prospective members who are “chasing ink.” He said 
“it’s the word out” that only *two deputies are inked each year — women and 
Black people aren’t allowed*. A vast majority of members and prospects, he 
said, have been involved in high-profile shootings or beatings.

After a shooting, members will have a party at a bar and call it a “998 
debrief,” referencing the code for a deputy-involved shooting. Some say it’s to 
celebrate that a deputy survived, he said. But often, Gonzalez said, after the 
party, the deputy and his partner will get inked. Gonzalez said he’d never been 
invited to nor attended one.

“I think it is some type of reward,” Gonzalez testified. He added later: “So we 
call it ‘ink chasers’ because they’re out there trying to show the rest of the 
members, the rest of the inked members that, you know, they’re worthy of that 
tattoo.”

Gonzalez, 42, joined the department as a deputy in 2008. He was investigated by 
Los Angeles police in 2012 on an allegation of sexual misconduct. The district 
attorney’s office declined to file charges. He said in his deposition that he 
was relieved of duty for the off-duty incident but that the allegation was 
unfounded and he was not disciplined.

Gonzalez’s attorney Alan Romero said that disclosing the allegation about his 
client “is totally irrelevant to the heroism of his coming forward to protect 
the public, and only serves to deter and frighten future whistleblowers from 
coming forward.”

“The L.A. Times would be sending a clear message: If you want to blow the 
whistle on public corruption, be warned that we will dig into your history and 
disclose any false allegations that [were] ever made against you.”

Gonzalez said in the deposition that Jaime Juarez, a deputy he identified as 
the Executioners’ shot caller, carried out a work slowdown last year when the 
acting captain refused to install a member as scheduling deputy. The powerful 
position, which Juarez had previously held, controls scheduling, days off and 
overtime, Gonzalez said.

“There was nobody being arrested. Very minimal arrests were being done at that 
time,” Gonzalez said of the work slowdown. “We have a booking line. We would 
hardly ever see a unit in the booking line with, you know — you know, with 
suspects in their back seats. It was so obvious that, you know, we all noticed 
that.”

The Times has requested arrest records from the Compton station to determine 
whether such a slowdown occurred. Juarez did not respond to a request for 
comment. Elizabeth Gibbons, an attorney representing Juarez, denied the 
allegations against him on Friday but declined to comment further, citing the 
ongoing Sheriff’s Department investigation.

In 2017, Gonzalez said, the Compton station captain at the time had turned to 
that deputy to boost arrest statistics after the captain was reprimanded for 
low numbers at the station. Monthly arrests per deputy more than doubled and 
that captain was eventually promoted, he said.

Gonzalez testified that he faced blowback earlier this year after anonymously 
reporting an Executioner to the Internal Affairs Bureau for assaulting a fellow 
deputy. After Gonzalez made his report, graffiti appeared at the station 
calling him a rat. He was warned by another deputy to be careful.

“They know it was you,” Gonzalez recalled being told. He filed a legal claim 
against the county in June alleging retaliation.

One deputy told Gonzalez he didn’t want to partner with him out of fear of 
getting “screwed with,” he said.

Gonzalez testified that he feared for his safety from the clique.

“I think that I now call them a gang because that’s what gangs do. They beat up 
other people,” he said. " I call that a gang. Their focus is not the station, 
their focus is not the department, and their focus is not their job. Their 
focus is their group.”


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#1615): https://groups.io/g/marxmail/message/1615
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/76875670/21656
-=-=-
POSTING RULES & NOTES
#1 YOU MUST clip all extraneous text when replying to a message.
#2 This mail-list, like most, is publicly & permanently archived.
#3 Subscribe and post under an alias if #2 is a concern.
-=-=-
Group Owner: marxmail+ow...@groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://groups.io/g/marxmail/leave/8674936/1316126222/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to