to another NT box, and
then use NM through that. The NM server needs to be on a different machine as
the PPTP server, though.
This is the way I use it. However, PPTP is rather slow.
-Joe
--
---
Joachim Feise Ph.D. Student
now, since I have a direct
connection now, but there are no takers. Cable is just too big here.
Joe
--
---
Joachim Feise Ph.D. Student, Information Computer Science
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu
0.0.0.0/0
1024:65535
It looks like the way you have it set up is a bit
backwards...(ofcourse my thinking could be backwards, it's WAY too
early right now!)
These caught my eyes as well. Why are you having 1024:65535 in there?
Joe
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft Certified Solution
that is executed before the rc.local file. The exit not
just terminates whatever file it is in, but the whole process.
It also may be that your rc.local file is not executable.
Joe
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
I removed 95 from my system. But I
guess it's similar: Control Panel/Network; select TCP/IP on the Protocols tab
(NT), TCP/IP -Ethernet card (95); click Properties; uncheck 'Enable DNS for
Windows Resolution' (NT), don't remember the corresponding 95 item.
Joe
--
Joachim Feise
set this stuff in
RedHat.
Other than that, I have the same setting: one PCI NE2000 compatible, one ISA
card.
Works fine for me.
Joe
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
assistance would be appreciated Steve Helder
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
It only shows the used ones, but you have to know that irq3 is still reserved
for the second serial even if it doesn't show up.
Joe
John Lombardo wrote:
cat /proc/interrupts
Shows which interrupts are in use and what they're used for.
-Original Message-
From: Joachim Feise
PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
would start investigating in
that direction. MTU should not matter in this case, since MTU would affect
everything.
-Joe
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
ipfwadm -F -a m -S 192.168.1.0/24 -D 0.0.0.0/0
^
I suppose your local net is 192.168.0.x. So that is what you need to set in
ipfwadm. Watch out for these little typos.
Joe
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Just forward it to your box using ipautofw.
ipautofw -A -r tcp 6112 6112
ipautofw -A -r udp 6112 6112
Never tested with battle net, but other stuff (Netmeeting) works this way.
-Joe
Paul Light wrote:
I imagine that this question has been answered..
how the hell do I get battle net
Dave wrote:
Greetings.
Most of the discussions on this list seem to involve RedHat Linux.
I'm running slackware as well, but masquerading is a kernel issue, so it should
be independent of the distribution. The only difference is the location and
naming of the startup scripts (aka rc
all.
On my own box, with Slackware, it works fine.
Does anybody know about this and how to get rid of it?
-Joe
--
Joachim Feise
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For daily digest info, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Joachim Feise
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
the
ip_masq_ftp module.)
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joachim Feise writes:
I am setting up a Red Hat box with masquerading. Everything works
fine,
except for ftp:
Whenever I do a dir in ftp, I get an error "500 - Port protocol
error".
I can cd to directories, but I ca
, and was getting
that error. I found that using ipmasqadm instead of ipautofw/ipportfw works
fine. You might want to give it a shot.
Do you have a URL for ipmasqadm? I got the same error on the 2.1 kernels, and
got back to 2.0 because of that.
-Joe
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft
it.
PLEASE HELP ME!!!
this has been the sole problem with my setup! It's the only thing holding
back the implementation of the Ip masq server. PLEASE! any URL, mail
address, or suggestion would be GREATLY appreciated.
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
mailto
.
--
Joachim Feise Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jfeise/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
19 matches
Mail list logo