****************************************
 From the Chicago Tribune,  Monday, April 30, 2001, p. 14. 
[Editorial]. See 
http://archive.chicago.tribune.com/@H9ef5315590fa8faccea208e41517fdf6:b=w&tid=c3c2a950545911d595b21c3f5968cc77&domain=dr_Article&fmt=int&it=991158086&expire=993750059&kid=550003.60&ss=env/archive/3/get_doc.pl?DBLIST=ct01&DOCNUM=42735
 
; charge of $2.95.
****************************************

WHAT CHARTER SCHOOLS TEACH US

Five years ago, swept up in a spell of reform, state lawmakers joined 
a national movement and cleared the way for a limited number of 
charter schools to open in the state.

By so doing, they took a risk -- though not exactly the one they had 
in mind. Turns out the riskiest thing about charter schools is how no 
one seems to understand them, even all these years later and with 
about 2,100 established nationwide over the last decade.

Bad information, unfortunately, now stands in the way of two 
important pieces of legislation under debate in Springfield.

One bill would allow Chicago to double the number of possible city 
charters to 30. The other would
permanently fund charters closer to the level taxpayers fund public 
schools. Charter schools currently do not receive annual funding for 
facilities, only about $5,000 per pupil for instruction. They are 
forced to dip into their program funds to pay for building 
improvements.

For Illinois to bring charter schools on par with public schools 
would require roughly $1,000 more per student, or about $6 million. 
 From a state perspective, this amounts to a teardrop in the bathtub 
of education funding. From the teachers unions' point of view, this 
represents competition for their slice of the pie.

It's time to regard education more from a student's point of view. 
What is wrong with giving this innovative approach toward education 
reform the best chance at succeeding? If it fails to produce better 
results, there are expedient ways to halt the experiment. But since 
the nation's first charter school opened in Minnesota, the track 
record has provided mostly hope.

---

So here's a primer.

Lesson one: Charters are public schools. They are open to any 
youngster who applies, including special ed kids. In fact, they often 
attract kids with discipline problems the regular public schools are 
happy to see go. If more children apply than there are spaces, as is 
the case with 70 percent of charter schools across the country, 
students are chosen by lottery.

Lesson two: Because they are free from most district and union 
regulations, charter schools can hire and fire teachers with 
flexibility and speed, and make creative curriculum choices. They can 
offer, for example, incentive pay to teachers who are in high-demand 
fields, successful at raising test scores or adept at getting parents 
involved.

Lesson three: Charters are accountable -- to everyone. Students take 
the same standardized tests as those in regular public schools. 
Sub-par teachers are unlikely to get their annual contracts renewed 
by the principal. Parents who don't like the school may simply pull 
their child out. Charter schools also must follow all the building, 
health and safety laws that every other school in the state must 
follow. And if the charters fail to teach, like the now-closed 
Chicago Prep, they get put out of business.

Lesson four: Charter schools provide alternatives to neighborhood 
public schools, yes, but they also are designed to force the 
traditional schools to innovate on their own.

Where many public schools are beholden to entrenched bureaucracy, 
charter schools wrap themselves around a mission. At Triumphant on 
the South Side, that mission is discipline; Principal Helen Hawkins 
asks public schools for their lowest-performing kids because she 
wants to reach them before they drop out. At Betty Shabazz, the focus 
is on African-American history. At Young Women's Leadership Charter 
School, girls are encouraged to succeed in fields where women are
underrepresented.

Noble Street Charter School is a perfect example of why charters need 
to be given the same chance at success as regular public schools.

The West Town building was constructed for less than $5 million -- 
half from foundation and private sources, half from a loan. Taxpayers 
are getting a deal. Once his high school expands to four full grades 
in two years, Principal Michael Milkie will have to start making 
$350,000 in annual interest payments on that loan. He would prefer to 
build a science lab, or a library, or add another floor to the tiny 
school space.

In the meantime, he and the school's 16 teachers improvise with 
space, scheduling and community
resources. If state lawmakers do not pass legislation increasing 
facilities funding by the time his school doubles its student 
population, they will have to really  improvise -- or accept fewer 
kids.

Every few weeks, kids march down to the public library branch to 
check out new books for daily literature group. On nice days, they 
spend study hall reading or shooting basketballs in Eckhart Park 
three blocks away. The girls' swim team practices at a nearby Chicago 
Park District pool. Students are bused to gym class at the nearby 
Lakeshore Athletic Club, where they take spinning, yoga and other 
classes. The Northwestern University Settlement House, to which the 
school is connected through its charter and building, provides arts 
and theater facilities, payroll advice and even Americorps community 
service workers to help out in a classroom pinch.

Instead of investing initially in a library, Milkie and his 
co-founder and wife, Tonya Hernandez, invested in technology. Mounted 
on the ceiling of each classroom is a small overhead projector and 
sound system that hooks into a laptop on each teacher's desk. In Tim 
Brown's civics class, he used it one day last week to play an 
Animaniacs song about the 50 states as 20 students learned names of 
capitals. In Jim O'Connor's biology class, he uses it to display 
graphics about primates and to access the Internet for a section on 
evolution.

Alvaro del Campo spent 10 years working in a Peruvian rainforest 
before coming to Noble Street to teach  environmental science. Milkie 
describes him as "a fantastic teacher" who has taken kids to the 
South Side to look at parakeets and is about to take 15 students on a 
study trip to Peru. Because he is not certified, however, the public 
schools never could have hired him.

Teachers receive bonuses for high parental involvement, the kind of 
incentive that most teacher unions steadfastly resist. Their salaries 
also are set slightly above the Chicago Public Schools pay scale, 
regardless of whether they hold any kind of advanced degree (which 
Milkie argues says little about teaching ability.) But they are 
expected to work long hours; the average day runs from 7 a.m. to 5 
p.m. They also have far greater input into how the school is run. The 
philosophy here is that bureaucracy causes burn-out faster than hard 
work does.

"The big difference you see in these schools is a real sense of 
mission, of a culture, of people working together in a very 
supportive environment," said Greg Richmond, who oversees charters 
for the Chicago Public School system.

Gisele Gonzalez, 14, says she feels safer and more cared for by 
teachers at Noble Street, partly because they allow her and other 
students to stay at school until dinnertime if they want. "The public 
school I went to, the teachers didn't pay attention if you didn't do 
your homework."

In fact, Noble Street makes it easy for families to pay attention to 
those details, too. Parents may check their child's progress every 
day using a special Internet access code that allows them to see 
updated grades on homework assignments and tests.

Students comment about how strict the school is. They have a dress 
code -- white, blue or maroon polo shirts, khaki pants and no 
sneakers. (Milkie confides, "Teens need something to rebel against.") 
Four demerits (or a single chewing gum incident) earns an automatic 
trip to "Saturday School," where students are required to cough up a 
symbolic $5 to pay for their teacher's time.

When a few students started acting out in the classrooms, Milkie and 
the teachers decided the teens needed more than just detention. So 
they quickly shifted budget money to hire a social worker to do a 
10-week group session. "It worked so well - -no miracles, but I 
believe we nipped the problem in the bud - -that we are now doing a 
second 10-week session," Milkie said.

One of the most striking aspects of Noble Street is what's missing: 
Noise in the hallways between classes. Graffiti. Tardiness. 
Absenteeism. Rudeness. In fact, all students are trained to greet 
every visitor with a shake of the hand and a self-introduction.

---

The real test with Noble Street and other charter schools will come 
with time, which will reveal whether achievement scores show 
sustained progress.

A few of the state's 21 charters have had rocky starts. But among the 
others, the results look promising. Seven of Chicago's 12 charter 
schools last year performed better than their comparison neighborhood 
schools in reading and math. The average score for these charters was 
more than 11 percent higher than the traditional public school.

And if there's any doubt that lower and middle income parents are 
clamoring for more charters, consider these numbers: This year Milkie 
has 250 students and more than 300 on a waiting list to get in.

Charter school principals such as Milkie are forced to spend too much 
of their time on PR, fund-raising and politics. Their attention would 
be better spent on preparing the school for the coming year, 
recruiting excellent teachers and developing curriculum. Liberals and 
conservatives have come to recognize that, for too long, charter 
schools have been unfairly treated as the
stepchild of public education.

But there's an even more important reason why charter schools should 
be supported both on the state and federal level. They offer a choice 
to parents who, because of income or geography, have none. Wealthier 
parents already have alternatives. It's time to level the playing 
field when it comes to educational opportunity.
----------------------------------
Sidebar:  What is wrong with giving this innovative approach toward 
education reform the best chance at succeeding?
**************************************************
-- 
Jerry P.Becker
Department of Curriculum & Instruction
Southern Illinois University
Carbondale, IL  62901-4610  USA
Phone:  (618) 453-4241  [O]
             (618)  457-8903 [H]
Fax:      (618) 453-4244
E-mail:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----------------------------------------------------
This is the CPS Mathematics Teacher Discussion List. 

To unsubscribe, send a message to
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

For more information:
<http://home.sprintmail.com/~mikelach/subscribe.html>.

To search the archives:
<http://www.mail-archive.com/science%40lists.csi.cps.k12.il.us/>

Reply via email to