On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 9:37 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Hunter wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > The present NavigationToolbar2 is very nice, but I am thinking about an
> > > improvement: adding a button that would
John Hunter wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The present NavigationToolbar2 is very nice, but I am thinking about an
>> improvement: adding a button that would rotate a constraint among three
>> possibilities, so that pan/zoom and rectangle selec
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The present NavigationToolbar2 is very nice, but I am thinking about an
> improvement: adding a button that would rotate a constraint among three
> possibilities, so that pan/zoom and rectangle select could be set to
> aff
Hi Eric,
On Sunday 13 April 2008 7:39:14 pm Eric Firing wrote:
> The present NavigationToolbar2 is very nice, but I am thinking about an
> improvement: adding a button that would rotate a constraint among three
> possibilities, so that pan/zoom and rectangle select could be set to
> affect only X,
The present NavigationToolbar2 is very nice, but I am thinking about an
improvement: adding a button that would rotate a constraint among three
possibilities, so that pan/zoom and rectangle select could be set to
affect only X, only Y, or be left unconstrained as at present.
The problem with th
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 3:24 PM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 2:19 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and then this was added, as something else that had been agreed at the
> > same sprint:
> > import pylab as plt
> > I think this is a mistake
