I forgot to mention -- A handful of SVG examples (polar_demo.py,
specgram_demo.py) cause my Firefox 2.0.0.14 on RHEL4 to crash. These
same files read fine in Inkscape 0.46. AFAICT, there is some sort of
limit on the number of vertices in a path, as shortening them does help,
but I couldn't fi
John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Sorry, I mistyped -- it's r5082/r5083. I think those revisions were trying
>> to deal with something more specific to Postscript. Here's the commit note:
>>
>> "Alternative fix for ps backend
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:36 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, I mistyped -- it's r5082/r5083. I think those revisions were trying
> to deal with something more specific to Postscript. Here's the commit note:
>
> "Alternative fix for ps backend bug; removes superfluous g
John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The SVG examples all look good now, as does PDF and Agg (unless I'm missing
>> some small details in my quick scanning of the images).
>>
>> The problem with quadmesh_demo in the Ps backend s
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 12:18 PM, Michael Droettboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The SVG examples all look good now, as does PDF and Agg (unless I'm missing
> some small details in my quick scanning of the images).
>
> The problem with quadmesh_demo in the Ps backend seems to have been
> introduced
The SVG examples all look good now, as does PDF and Agg (unless I'm
missing some small details in my quick scanning of the images).
The problem with quadmesh_demo in the Ps backend seems to have been
introduced by r5082. r5081 (on backend_ps.py alone) seems to work, with
the exception that str
I'm making some progress on SVG -- all issues I've seen so far seem to
be related to clipping. I'll let you know how it goes. Just a heads up
to delay the release for now (unless I come across something that
doesn't look like it can be fixed in a short amount of time.)
Cheers,
Mike
Eric Firi
Personally, I like the use of decorators for this -- it seems to be a nice
clean tool for the job -- but it could be controversial. Fortunately, this
is a nice self-contained usage that could be considered an experimental
foray into decorators, and it doesn't affect outward-facing code.
As for a
