Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> Andrew Straw writes:
>
>
>> Michael Droettboom wrote:
>>
>>> We can probably standardize the version of gs on the buildbot machines,
>>> but it's been very useful up to now to have tests that can run on a
>>> variety of developer machines as well.
>>>
>>>
Andrew Straw writes:
> Michael Droettboom wrote:
>> We can probably standardize the version of gs on the buildbot machines,
>> but it's been very useful up to now to have tests that can run on a
>> variety of developer machines as well.
>>
> I understood Jouni's idea to be to save the .pdfs as
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 5:38 PM, wrote:
> I just downloaded 0.99.1 and ran into some problems using it in Sage.
> Basically, in the tar.gz file, there was a setup.cfg file, which had the
> following:
This was a bug in the tarball -- mpl doesn't keep a copy of setup.cfg
in svn and shouldn't ship
I just downloaded 0.99.1 and ran into some problems using it in Sage.
Basically, in the tar.gz file, there was a setup.cfg file, which had the
following:
Note that some options are already uncommented, forcing a build of
tkagg, wxagg, and macosx backends, and forcing the default backend to be
Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
>
>> I am thinking about adding pdf comparison ability to compare_images. One
>> simple way to do this would be to convert pdf files to pngs using
>> Ghostscript: if we store reference pdf files, and both the reference
>> file and the result o
Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> I am thinking about adding pdf comparison ability to compare_images. One
> simple way to do this would be to convert pdf files to pngs using
> Ghostscript: if we store reference pdf files, and both the reference
> file and the result of the test are converted using with e
I am thinking about adding pdf comparison ability to compare_images. One
simple way to do this would be to convert pdf files to pngs using
Ghostscript: if we store reference pdf files, and both the reference
file and the result of the test are converted using with exactly the
same version of gs, th
On second look, I think it's the "--small" commandline option that
breaks this. I hadn't tested my recent changes to the plot directive
with that flag. The new version of make.py in SVN r7815 should fix this.
Mike
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm a bit unsure if this is really a problem in
It's also an overridable parameter in conf.py. Of course, it works with
the conf.py in SVN, but do you perhaps have any local changes to it?
Mike
Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm a bit unsure if this is really a problem in the code or it's my
> machine that has problem (I didn't manage to tes