Have a look at https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib
Cheers, Tobi
Am 13.04.2011 00:03, schrieb Ian Bell:
Where is the bleeding edge MPL source located? It doesn't seem to be
subversion,
http://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/matplotlib/trunk/matplotlib/
stuck at revision 8988 or ht
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 4:13 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> Yes, I'll get thus fixed ASAP
John, quick note: our local network is down (firewall transfer went
awry), so if you need to rebuild the docs, you'll need to do it on
another system than my box (I'm using a laptop over wireless to send
this).
On Apr 12, 2011, at 6:03 PM, Ian Bell wrote:
> Fernando,
>
> Perfect! Thanks for the information. Perhaps this can get updated on the
> web somehow?
Yes, I'll get thus fixed ASAP
>
> Ian
>
>
> Ian Bell
> Graduate Research Assistant
> Herrick Labs
> Purdue University
> email: ib
Fernando,
Perfect! Thanks for the information. Perhaps this can get updated on the
web somehow?
Ian
Ian Bell
Graduate Research Assistant
Herrick Labs
Purdue University
email: ib...@purdue.edu
cell: (607)227-7626
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Fernando Perez wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On Tu
Hi Ian,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Ian Bell wrote:
> Where is the bleeding edge MPL source located? It doesn't seem to be
> subversion,
> http://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/matplotlib/trunk/matplotlib/
> stuck at revision 8988 or https://github.com/astraw/matplotlib, which is
>
Where is the bleeding edge MPL source located? It doesn't seem to be
subversion,
http://matplotlib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/matplotlib/trunk/matplotlib/stuck
at revision 8988 or
https://github.com/astraw/matplotlib, which is also from november of last
year. If the bleeding-edge code is somewhe
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Darren Dale wrote:
> That looks right to me. I find it easier to keep a local copy of
> integration branches like v1.0.x and master
BTW, I do that for my old stable branches: in addition to my main
ipython repo directory, I keep a branches/ dir with static copies
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Darren Dale wrote:
>
> Brilliant, whatever they use allows uploading attachments.
I know this isn't ideal, but a workaround for screenshots/images in
mpl bug reports would be to upload them to something like imgur (free
- no registration required):
http://imgur.c
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> Ok. I hope I fixed it. Here's what I did (from my clone of the
> matplotlib/matplotlib repository)
>
> > git branch v1.0.x e5970f4
> > git push origin v1.0.x
>
> Looking at the commit history and contents at the tip of this branch,
>
Ok. I hope I fixed it. Here's what I did (from my clone of the
matplotlib/matplotlib repository)
> git branch v1.0.x e5970f4
> git push origin v1.0.x
Looking at the commit history and contents at the tip of this branch,
everything looks ok. Someone want to verify for me?
Mike
On 04/12/20
On 04/12/2011 08:34 AM, Tobias Hoppe wrote:
> I've read the status page for py3k and stumbled upon the cleanup tasks,
> especially the version checks. I agree that calling sys.version_info[0] is
> not a
> smart choice.
>
> Why not use a new variable in __init__.py, something like a boolean
> __is
Looking at the network, this seems to be the last commit on the 1.0.x
branch:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/commit/e5970f4fa6589089ce60dad955831c7632606ead
This seems to be where I somehow killed the 1.0.x branch by doing what I
thought was a regular merge into master:
https://githu
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jae-Joon Lee wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I thought we have a "v1.0.x" branch on the github repo, but no more.
>
> https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/branches
>
> Hmm...
> Is it (accidentally?) removed or do we now use another branch for
> maintenance (although I don
Hi all,
I thought we have a "v1.0.x" branch on the github repo, but no more.
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/branches
Hmm...
Is it (accidentally?) removed or do we now use another branch for
maintenance (although I don't see any alternative)?
Regards,
-JJ
I've read the status page for py3k and stumbled upon the cleanup tasks,
especially the version checks. I agree that calling sys.version_info[0] is not
a
smart choice.
Why not use a new variable in __init__.py, something like a boolean
__is_py3k__.
Every module which needs a choice between py2
15 matches
Mail list logo