On Saturday, September 24, 2011, Mike Kaufman wrote:
> Possible bug report:
>
> "Exception occurred rendering plot."
>
> http://matplotlib.github.com/examples/api/sankey_demo.html
>
> This is with firefox 6.0.2
>
> M
>
This was discovered and fixed in master a couple of months ago.
Essentially,
Possible bug report:
"Exception occurred rendering plot."
http://matplotlib.github.com/examples/api/sankey_demo.html
This is with firefox 6.0.2
M
--
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valu
Jouni K. Seppänen writes:
> Jouni K. Seppänen writes:
>
>> The light and condensed fonts are DejaVuSans, which happened to be
>> installed on the system on which that test was created. I think the test
>> should only rely on the fonts delivered with matplotlib.
>
> I created a github issue:
>
>
Benjamin Root writes:
>> FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_mlab.test_recarray_csv_roundtrip
>
> I am seeing this one on my 64-bit machine, but not on my 32-bit machine
> (both Linux).
Fix in https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/490
The uninitialized memory being written to disk sometimes con
On 9/24/2011 11:41 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> The source tarball for the rc can be found here:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0/
>
> binary builders can use this and upload the binaries there. Please let
> me know when the windows and mac binaries
Jouni K. Seppänen writes:
> The light and condensed fonts are DejaVuSans, which happened to be
> installed on the system on which that test was created. I think the test
> should only rely on the fonts delivered with matplotlib.
I created a github issue:
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib
Jouni K. Seppänen writes:
>>> FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_text.test_font_styles.test
>>> FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_text.test_font_styles.test
>>>
>> How much was the difference?
>
> Large: in all three result images, the condensed and light fonts look
> the same as normal, and there are differe
The source tarball for the rc can be found here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-1.1.0/
binary builders can use this and upload the binaries there. Please let me
know when the windows and mac binaries are ready so that we can make an
official call for test
Jouni K. Seppänen writes:
>>> FAIL: no_testCreateLocaltime (test_tzinfo.LocalTestCase)
>>>
>> Any info provided on this failure?
>
> AssertionError: '2004-10-31 02:00:00 AMT+0020' != '2004-10-31 02:00:00
> CET+0100'
That test has a comment "It would be nice if this worked, but it
doesn't." and
Benjamin Root writes:
>> I'm seeing five test failures on my Mac (Python 2.7):
>>
>> FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_mlab.test_recarray_csv_roundtrip
>>
>
> I am seeing this one on my 64-bit machine, but not on my 32-bit machine
> (both Linux).
>
>
>> FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_text.test_font_styles
Ok, the v1.1.0 branch has been created, and I am in the process of doing the
tarballs and such. Please file any pull requests against that branch. I
will also tag v1.1.0-rc1 when I make the official announcement.
Ben Root
---
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> I'm seeing five test failures on my Mac (Python 2.7):
>
> FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_mlab.test_recarray_csv_roundtrip
>
I am seeing this one on my 64-bit machine, but not on my 32-bit machine
(both Linux).
> FAIL: matplotlib.tests.te
I'm seeing five test failures on my Mac (Python 2.7):
FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_mlab.test_recarray_csv_roundtrip
FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_text.test_font_styles.test
FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_text.test_font_styles.test
FAIL: matplotlib.tests.test_tightlayout.test_tight_layout5.test
FAIL: no_
I'm pleased to announce basemap has just been accepted into Debian,
and soon will be available to unstable/testing users! Thanks for your
help in this process!
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 11:17, Debian FTP Masters
wrote:
>
>
>
> Accepted:
> basemap_1.0.1-1.debian.tar.gz
> to main/b/basemap/basemap_1
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> I will see about cutting the release, but I won't be able to upload any
> files to SF, unless somebody can give me that permission for my account.
I have made you a project admin on the sf site. That means you have
full permission to do an
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:04 PM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> Personally, my vote is to live with the deprecation warnings. They only
> happen if you turn warnings on in python 2.7 (by default, they are off). I
> am not that comfortable with such a change this close to release for a minor
> issue (unl
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:37 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> Working through the checklist, I am wary of cutting an RC at this particular
> moment. Why is just about a quarter of all the tests coming back as known
There are only two legit known fails, one in test_basic and one in
test_dates and thes
17 matches
Mail list logo
