I just noticed a small documentation issue yesterday. This table does not
include the
gtk3 backend
http://matplotlib.org/1.2.0/faq/usage_faq.html#what-is-a-backend
Should we update the table to include the gtk3 backend? (and note that the
qt3 backend is depreciated)
Jens
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu wrote:
The milestone is clear. Is there anything we're missing?
If not, I plan to cut a final release and update the documentation
website tomorrow morning.
I just submitted #1462 against v1.2.x, (which is also pending as
Just closed the PR which proposes this change against master (in favour of
the one against v1.2.x).
It is very late in the day to be making so many example changes (especially
as we don't have tests for them).
Personally, the balance between the risks vs the benefits doesn't give me
much
While I think Paul's contribution in #1462 is great, I'd prefer to not
put this in 1.2.0. There just isn't enough time to review such a large
patch this late in the game. As our experience with Nelle's valuable
PEP8 work shows, it's still possible to slip in accidental breakage even
when
See
https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/1463
Mike
On 11/08/2012 03:06 AM, Jens Nielsen wrote:
I just noticed a small documentation issue yesterday. This table does
not include the
gtk3 backend
http://matplotlib.org/1.2.0/faq/usage_faq.html#what-is-a-backend
Should we update
There is a link to the CHANGELOG (are we even keeping that up to date
anymore?) on the main page that is dead.
Ben Root
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download
And I had completely missed that this was taken care of yesterday.
However, the changelog link from the what's new page is still dead.
Ben
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
There is a link to the CHANGELOG (are we even keeping that up to date
anymore?) on
To raise (built) documentation based problems, I have been creating issues
in https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib.github.com .
That seems to work well, but sadly, it always seems to be Michael that ends
up sorting it out... he is a victim of his own success (and speed) ;-)
On 8 November
It's actually better to create these issues against the main matplotlib
repository since all of the bugs are fixed over there in the source.
matplotlib.github.com only contains generated files.
Mike
On 11/08/2012 11:50 AM, Phil Elson wrote:
To raise (built) documentation based problems, I
This will be addressed when I update the docs to 1.2.0 shortly.
Mike
On 11/08/2012 11:31 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
And I had completely missed that this was taken care of yesterday.
However, the changelog link from the what's new page is still dead.
Ben
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 11:24 AM,
Thanks again to everyone for all of their hard work. This release has
been tagged and uploaded.
As per the usual drill, once we have the binaries up, I'll make an ANN
on matplotlib-users.
The documentation is currently being rebuilt, and the default for
matplotlib.org will update to 1.2.0
In article 509be976.90...@stsci.edu,
Michael Droettboom md...@stsci.edu
wrote:
Thanks again to everyone for all of their hard work. This release has
been tagged and uploaded.
As per the usual drill, once we have the binaries up, I'll make an ANN
on matplotlib-users.
The
Hello,
I noticed that a program I had that uses canvas.blit() to do animated graphs
with the gtkagg backend was leaking memory.
I tracked this down to gtk gc's being allocated in agg_to_gtk_drawable with
gdk_gc_new(), but never being destroyed.
The leak can be seen using the 'Animating
On 08/11/2012 17:18, Michael Droettboom wrote:
Thanks again to everyone for all of their hard work.
Yep. And a fantastic memorial in its own right to the late John Hunter.
As per the usual drill, once we have the binaries up, I'll make an ANN
on matplotlib-users.
IIRC matplotlib is
-- Forwarded message --
From: Damon McDougall damon.mcdoug...@gmail.com
Date: Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:16 PM
Subject: Re: [matplotlib-devel] 1.2.0 Final tagged and uploaded
To: Russell E. Owen ro...@uw.edu
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:52 PM, Russell E. Owen ro...@uw.edu wrote:
In
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Mark Lawrence breamore...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On 08/11/2012 17:18, Michael Droettboom wrote:
Thanks again to everyone for all of their hard work.
Yep. And a fantastic memorial in its own right to the late John Hunter.
As per the usual drill, once we have the
16 matches
Mail list logo
