On 2014/05/15 5:16 PM, Thomas Caswell wrote:
Sorry for dropping the ball on moving things forward.
On the contrary, you have been doing a great job on this, and you
deserve a lot of thanks from all of us.
I would propose a feature freeze this weekend and the goal of getting
the first RC out
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Maybe this problem could be reduced by having a directory for CHANGELOG
chunks, one file per PR, with the PR number as the filename. Then at
release time they could be concatenated, edited, appended to the real
CHANGELOG,
Thanks for doing all this work, 1.4 is more than overdue!
I justed wanted to chime in on Qt 5: Put it in and mark
the support as experimental. So we can fix it in minor
releases, also without exposure bugs won't be found.
Till
On 16 May 2014 01:17, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Maybe this problem could be reduced by having a directory for CHANGELOG
chunks, one file per PR, with the PR number as the filename. Then at
release time they could be concatenated, edited, appended to the real
CHANGELOG, and
Thomas Kluyver, on 2014-05-16 08:56, wrote:
On 16 May 2014 01:17, Eric Firing efir...@hawaii.edu wrote:
Maybe this problem could be reduced by having a directory for CHANGELOG
chunks, one file per PR, with the PR number as the filename. Then at
release time they could be concatenated,
