On 31 January 2014 22:43, Benjamin Root wrote:
> Thanks for bringing this back onto the mailing list.
>
> I am excited for the prospect of new algorithms for contouring. My company
> has actually been using the contourf() function for the past few years to
> generate the polygons from gridded dat
On 31 January 2014 19:51, Eric Firing wrote:
> Would the new code be substantially simpler if the blocky capability were
> omitted from it? If so, then it seems like it would makes sense to leave
> the blocky form to the old code.
>
Simpler, yes, but not substantially so. I would prefer to kee
Thanks for bringing this back onto the mailing list.
I am excited for the prospect of new algorithms for contouring. My company
has actually been using the contourf() function for the past few years to
generate the polygons from gridded data to then make shapefiles from those
polygons. Having an r
On 2014/01/30 10:22 PM, Ian Thomas wrote:
> (Taking this away from the mailing list as it is going off topic).
I'm putting it on the devel list; it will be good for others to know
this is in the works, and be able to advise on strategy before it gets
to the PR stage.
>
> The new contour code c