On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Tom Holroyd (NIH/NIMH) [E]
wrote:
>
>
> John Hunter wrote:
>>
>> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-0.99.3
>
> I'm running Fedora 13, and it mostly works but the config output says that
> Tkinter isn't there, but it is. It finds
John Hunter wrote:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/matplotlib/files/matplotlib/matplotlib-0.99.3
I'm running Fedora 13, and it mostly works but the config output says that
Tkinter isn't there, but it is. It finds Qt4 OK, but seems to have trouble
finding tkinter and agg. I just did the yum
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:15 PM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
>> Do you have in mind a dual release--maintenance branch and trunk--or is
>> v0_99_maint abandoned with no release? Another option would be to make
>> a 99 release ASAP and delay the 1.0.
Hi,
>> Multiple options (as far as I have understand github). You could use one
>> account with multiple ssh-keys or you can add "contributors" to the
>> repository
>> in the repositorys Admin-panel, which I haven't tried out, yet.
>
> The github TOS allow only one person per account. I guess tha
On 05/30/2010 05:54 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> now. Everyone who has some free time should tackle outstanding bugs
> on the tracker. I am aware of a compile problem on solaris with CXX6
Appeal to all developers, official or not: there are 95 open bugs listed
on the tracker at the moment.
I susp
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 12:05 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> Do you have in mind a dual release--maintenance branch and trunk--or is
> v0_99_maint abandoned with no release? Another option would be to make
> a 99 release ASAP and delay the 1.0.
I do want to put out one last maintenance branch release
On 05/30/2010 05:54 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
>
>> I agree that there should be a release before the transition.
>
> I was initially reluctant to do a release before the transition
> because of the get_sample_data issue. I was worried that
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 5:18 AM, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> I agree that there should be a release before the transition.
I was initially reluctant to do a release before the transition
because of the get_sample_data issue. I was worried that some 1.x
releases would point to the sf site and som
Malte Dik writes:
> Eric Firing wrote:
>
>> 2) If I understand correctly, a key question is who will have commit
>> rights to the master repo on github. It seems that an exception is
>> required to allow that access to more than one person.
>
> Multiple options (as far as I have understand git
Hi,
>
> 2) If I understand correctly, a key question is who will have commit
> rights to the master repo on github. It seems that an exception is
> required to allow that access to more than one person. My sense is that
> ideally we should have more than one person with that access, but far
> fe
On 04/23/2010 02:44 AM, John Hunter wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> Hello all,
>> in some time (let's say a couple of months, maybe more) Debian will
>> enter the "freeze" period, where no new upstream releases are
>> accepted, in order to prepare the best stable re
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Hello all,
> in some time (let's say a couple of months, maybe more) Debian will
> enter the "freeze" period, where no new upstream releases are
> accepted, in order to prepare the best stable release we can :)
>
> In the past months I see many
Hello all,
in some time (let's say a couple of months, maybe more) Debian will
enter the "freeze" period, where no new upstream releases are
accepted, in order to prepare the best stable release we can :)
In the past months I see many changes are accumulated in the SVN but
no new release are done.
13 matches
Mail list logo
