[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eric,
I think I understand the two approaches you mention, I have about the
same mental distinction although with a different spin, maybe because
I come from finite element/data visualisation instead of image
manipulation: I see basically two type of 2D
Hi Eric,
I think I understand the two approaches you mention, I have about the
same mental distinction although with a different spin, maybe because
I come from finite element/data visualisation instead of image
manipulation: I see basically two type of 2D data that can be
visualized as a
Michael Droettboom wrote:
It's funny you should mention this.
One of the things I realized after SciPy this year is that there is a
lot of interfacing of Numpy with C++ (as opposed to C) that could really
benefit from a standard C++ wrapper around Numpy.
Absolutely. Though now that you
Christopher Barker wrote:
Michael Droettboom wrote:
It's funny you should mention this.
One of the things I realized after SciPy this year is that there is a
lot of interfacing of Numpy with C++ (as opposed to C) that could really
benefit from a standard C++ wrapper around Numpy.
Hi John, Hi Eric,
In case this has slipped under the radar, I repost my patch for bilinear interp
in NonUniformImage (including the discussion around it). I think Eric is the
most concerned by this, but you were both
on holidays when I raised the issue in matplotlib newsgroup.
Best regards,
I'm going to again defer the real question of the functionality and
interface etc. to Eric and/or John etc., though it seems good in general.
I just have a couple of follow on comments related to implementation
details below.
Grégory Lielens wrote:
std::vector would have been nice, but I
Michael Droettboom wrote:
I think we want to use std::vector where possible for new code, and
convert as we go through old code. Manual malloc/free is just too error
prone. (We're forced to do some by interfacing with Python, but it
should be kept to a minimum).
My understanding is that
Thanks a lot for reviewing my patch!
I have corrected most of the problems (I think ;-) )
I indeed introduced memory leak, I think it is fixed now, I have also
reorganized the code to avoid duplication of the cleanup code. I used an
helper function instead of the goto, because this cleanup is