Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-28 Thread John Hunter
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now we got our bugs :) Mikhail, just give me a ping when you've done > with sphinx, I'll try to rebuild mpl asap. John, are you coming nearer > to a mpl full dot release, so that I can use it to build mpl for > debian, or w

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-28 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 06:51, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Twas brillig at 12:51:35 27.07.2008 UTC-05 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre > and gimble: > > >> It will help if you file a RC bug for sphinx :) > > JH> I'll be happy to, but should I wait until there is actually a > JH>

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-27 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 12:51:35 27.07.2008 UTC-05 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and gimble: >> It will help if you file a RC bug for sphinx :) JH> I'll be happy to, but should I wait until there is actually a JH> sphinx release out with the bugfix in it? No, just file a bug describing the problem

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-27 Thread Chris Walker
"John Hunter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Mikhail Gusarov > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Twas brillig at 12:30:39 27.07.2008 UTC-05 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre > > and gimble: > > > > JH> Mikhail, if you are so inclined and there is still time, you may >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-27 Thread Mikhail Gusarov
Twas brillig at 12:30:39 27.07.2008 UTC-05 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre and gimble: JH> Mikhail, if you are so inclined and there is still time, you may JH> want to see if Georg wants to put out another point release that JH> fixes this problem, and push the fix into the debian pipeline. W

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-27 Thread John Hunter
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 12:39 PM, Mikhail Gusarov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Twas brillig at 12:30:39 27.07.2008 UTC-05 when [EMAIL PROTECTED] did gyre > and gimble: > > JH> Mikhail, if you are so inclined and there is still time, you may > JH> want to see if Georg wants to put out another poi

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 19:30, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mikhail, if you are so inclined and there is still time, you may want > to see if Georg wants to put out another point release that fixes this > problem, and push the fix into the debian pipeline. Just as a note: today @ ~16.0

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-27 Thread John Hunter
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> The docs require sphinx 0.4, which if I recall correctly, we got >> pushed into debian on short notice precisely to support the mpl docs. >> What version of sphinx are you using? > > I'm using v0.4.1 or it's a strict depen

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-27 Thread Sandro Tosi
> The docs require sphinx 0.4, which if I recall correctly, we got > pushed into debian on short notice precisely to support the mpl docs. > What version of sphinx are you using? I'm using v0.4.1 or it's a strict depends on 0.4 only? I'm attaching the log for the build, it might be helpful. Tha

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-26 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 18:37, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Thanks! i've just downlaoded: is 55M tarball the real intended size? >>>

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-25 Thread Sandro Tosi
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 18:37, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Thanks! i've just downlaoded: is 55M tarball the real intended size? >> it seems a little too big... ;) > > Argg, I forgot to svn clean before I did

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-25 Thread John Hunter
On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Sandro Tosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks! i've just downlaoded: is 55M tarball the real intended size? > it seems a little too big... ;) Argg, I forgot to svn clean before I did the sdist. Please try again. http://matplotlib.sourceforge.net/tmp/matplot

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-25 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hi John, On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 21:17, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to try and get 98.3 and 91.5 out tomorrow or Saturday -- if > the weekday doesn't work for you Charlie we might do a source release > on Friday or Saturday (for Sandro/debian) and you can get the build As us

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-24 Thread Eric Firing
Eric Firing wrote: > John Hunter wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Running, I get a leak of about 5.6 KiB per loop. >>> I'm using matplotlib svn, macos 10.4, numpy 1.1.0 >> I'm not seeing this w/ PDF or Agg in linux... what backend are you >

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-24 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PDF. OK, correction, I am seeing this too. I cheated and didn't let the test run to the end. It looked like the memory was flat-lining so I moved on the Agg test (which is not leaking on my completed tests). > The examp

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-24 Thread Paul Kienzle
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 04:28:00PM -0500, John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Running, I get a leak of about 5.6 KiB per loop. > > I'm using matplotlib svn, macos 10.4, numpy 1.1.0 > > I'm not seeing this w/ PDF or Agg in linux... what

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-24 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also fixed some of the lesser used examples. I'm not going to try to > fix examples/units. examples/animation/anim.py doesn't update on my > wxagg backend (wx 2.8.3). I fixed a few of the units examples that were trivi

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-24 Thread Eric Firing
John Hunter wrote: > On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Testing hawaii on my machine, I saw the following error: >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >>File "memleak_hawaii3.py", line 13, in >> rand = np.mlab.rand >> AttributeError: 'modul

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-24 Thread John Hunter
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Paul Kienzle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Testing hawaii on my machine, I saw the following error: > > Traceback (most recent call last): >File "memleak_hawaii3.py", line 13, in > rand = np.mlab.rand > AttributeError: 'module' object has no attribute 'm

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-24 Thread Paul Kienzle
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 02:17:19PM -0500, John Hunter wrote: > I'd like to try and get 98.3 and 91.5 out tomorrow or Saturday -- if > the weekday doesn't work for you Charlie we might do a source release > on Friday or Saturday (for Sandro/debian) and you can get the build > out over the weekend (i

Re: [matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-24 Thread Charlie Moad
I am out on town for a meeting until Sunday evening. I unfortunately won't be able to act until Monday at the earliest. Cutting the source release sounds like a good plan. - Charlie On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 3:17 PM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to try and get 98.3 and 91.5

[matplotlib-devel] preparing for 0.98.3 and 0.91.5

2008-07-24 Thread John Hunter
I'd like to try and get 98.3 and 91.5 out tomorrow or Saturday -- if the weekday doesn't work for you Charlie we might do a source release on Friday or Saturday (for Sandro/debian) and you can get the build out over the weekend (if you have time). Obviously a lot of work has gone into these releas