On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
[snip]
> I'm guessing that's the issue, but just to be sure, try using the bare
I still get the error with the super-bare extension module, so
cython's off the hook :-).
> Have you verified that the same C++ compiler and version of libstdc+
Hoyt Koepke wrote:
> I'm really not sure which mailing list to report this on -- it has got
> to rank up there with one of the most obscure errors of all times. I
> suspect it's an error in gcc's new openmp implementation, gomp, but
> not sure; I can report it there if people think I should.
>
> I
I'm really not sure which mailing list to report this on -- it has got
to rank up there with one of the most obscure errors of all times. I
suspect it's an error in gcc's new openmp implementation, gomp, but
not sure; I can report it there if people think I should.
In gcc 4.4.1, when I compile a
