Re: [matplotlib-devel] yet another fancy arrow, etc

2008-09-24 Thread Michael Droettboom
Jae-Joon Lee wrote: >> I believe you are looking for the scanline boolean algebra -- search >> the antigrain demo page >> >> http://www.antigrain.com/demo/index.html >> >> for scanline_boolean.cpp. Of course, we would need to support the >> other major backends too >> >> > > I'm not sure

Re: [matplotlib-devel] yet another fancy arrow, etc

2008-09-24 Thread Jae-Joon Lee
> > Well merging is obviously better. I wrote YAArrow to support > plain-vanilla annotations. AFAIK, they are used nowhere else, so as > long as we could come up with one arrow class that works with > plain-vanilla and fancy annotations, that would be good. But it may > be easier said than done.

Re: [matplotlib-devel] yet another fancy arrow, etc

2008-09-23 Thread John Hunter
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Jae-Joon Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm working on the fancy annotation thing I mentioned the other day, > and I want to have some feedback and advice. > > As you see (http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/178748/test_fancy_annotation.jpg), > the annotation wi

[matplotlib-devel] yet another fancy arrow, etc

2008-09-23 Thread Jae-Joon Lee
Hello, I'm working on the fancy annotation thing I mentioned the other day, and I want to have some feedback and advice. As you see (http://dl.getdropbox.com/u/178748/test_fancy_annotation.jpg), the annotation will be consist of a fancy box + fancy arrow. And my current plan is to put the fancy a