On Nov 12, 2007 8:35 PM, Jarrod Millman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am willing to commit to helping migrating the relevant mlab code
> over to SciPy (or NumPy). The next release of SciPy
> (http://projects.scipy.org/scipy/scipy/milestone/0.7) may be pushed
> back a little, but it should be out
On Nov 12, 2007 1:19 PM, John Hunter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 12, 2007 12:15 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On a more strategic note: what do you see as the future of mlab, and its
> > place in pylab? Should mlab contain every neat function we can think
> > of, and if so
On Nov 12, 2007 12:15 PM, Eric Firing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In your list, "load" is duplicated.
Thanks, purged.
> On a more strategic note: what do you see as the future of mlab, and its
> place in pylab? Should mlab contain every neat function we can think
> of, and if so, should all of
John,
In your list, "load" is duplicated.
It would be nice if numpy.rank could be deprecated, since it seems to be
an alias for ndim (which is more descriptive and less ambiguous). We
could avoid the name clash by using "matrixrank" for the mlab version.
I suggest that for every name that con
