This weekend I put a bit of time into bringing the Debian packaging[1]
for the matplotlib 1.0 series up to date.
In the tree it seems there is a matplotlibrc in the /doc
directory. Judging from the documentation, it looks like matplotlib will
first use a matplotlibrc in the current directory. This
On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 14:01:26 -0600, John Hunter wrote:
> I will try and get to the release ASAP and set the sample_data up this way...
>
Any news on this? A release would be very nice. I did the bulk of the
work[1] to get the debian packaging working with the 1.0 series but I
can't really do much
Ben Gamari
writes:
> In practice, however, I have run into a few issues. First, the comment
> regarding examples.directory indicates that this path must be
> absolute. Is this really true?
The comment is wrong: a relative path will work (I just tried this).
> Secondly, it seems that the doc/ma
On Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:03:02 +0200, Jouni K. Seppänen wrote:
> Ben Gamari
> writes:
>
> > In practice, however, I have run into a few issues. First, the comment
> > regarding examples.directory indicates that this path must be
> > absolute. Is this really true?
>
> The comment is wrong: a rela
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Ben Gamari wrote:
>> I am not intimately familiar with the doc build system, but the way that
>> the "html" function in make.py copies matplotlibrc from mpl-data to
>> _static, I suspect that it is trying to ensure that that particular file
>> is used.
>>
> Anyone
