I'm going through and removing old and deprecated information from the
source tree.
I'm noticing that there are two makefiles for OS-X, one at ./make.osx
and one in release/osx/Makefile. The former was updated in Sep 2010,
the latter in Mar 2010. Our installation (installing.rst) recommends
On 04/01/2011 05:01 AM, Michael Droettboom wrote:
> I'm going through and removing old and deprecated information from the
> source tree.
>
> I'm noticing that there are two makefiles for OS-X, one at ./make.osx
> and one in release/osx/Makefile. The former was updated in Sep 2010,
> the latter in
Just had a thought and I am curious about what others think.
Now that we have agreed that calling a plotting function with empty data
should always be considered valid, should it also automatically advance the
colorcycle? I think it should.
Here is a use-case: consider a user who is plotting tem
On 04/01/2011 10:47 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> Just had a thought and I am curious about what others think.
>
> Now that we have agreed that calling a plotting function with empty data
> should always be considered valid, should it also automatically advance
> the colorcycle? I think it should.
I
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Eric Firing wrote:
> On 04/01/2011 10:47 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> > Just had a thought and I am curious about what others think.
> >
> > Now that we have agreed that calling a plotting function with empty data
> > should always be considered valid, should it also
