Hi Brendan, Justin,
Thanks for your reply. I agree then that a .stop() method is needed. This is
not very difficult; I'll try and implement it over the weekend.
Best,
-Michiel.
From: Brendan Barnwell
To: matplotlib-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, J
On 2013-07-18 06:56, Justin Lazear wrote:> Hi Michiel,
>
> On my system, deleting the timer has no effect and the timer continues
> to send events. The __del__ method seems to call the same unimplemented
> _timer_stop method. Regardless, something else has a reference to the
> timer (MPL event
Or make a stairstep, if each time has a finite duration. like the following
(though I am sure there are some inelegant code in there.
data = np.arange(10)
mask = [0,0,0,1,1,0,1,0,0,0]
x = np.ma.masked_array(data, mask)
t = arange(-0.5,shape(x)[0]-0.5,1.)
xx=ma.zeros((2,10))
xx[0,:]=x
xx[1,:]=
On 2013/07/17 11:25 PM, Gregorio Bastardo wrote:
> Thanks Mike, it's hard to spot, but still better than nothing. Anyway,
> could it be the default behaviour of plotting masked arrays (single
> pixel for an isolated element)?
Gregorio,
I don't think this would be a good idea. It adds quite a bit
Apologies: I didn't realize the link to the raw results only exists for
users with edit permissions. The public URL for the raw results is:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AjrPjlTMRTwTdHpQS25pcTZIRWdqX0pNckNSU01sMHc&usp=sharing
Mike
On 07/18/2013 09:42 AM, Michael Droettboom wrot
Hi Michiel,
On my system, deleting the timer has no effect and the timer continues
to send events. The __del__ method seems to call the same unimplemented
_timer_stop method. Regardless, something else has a reference to the
timer (MPL event loop maybe?) and __del__ is not being called once th
We have had 508 responses to the matplotlib user survey. Quite a nice
turnout!
You can view the results here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/viewanalytics?key=0AjrPjlTMRTwTdHpQS25pcTZIRWdqX0pNckNSU01sMHc&gridId=0#chart
and from there, you can access the complete raw results.
I will be d
Jeffrey,
Sorry if the documentation is a bit vague on the _axinfo front. It was
intentionally done that way to keep the number of people dependent upon
that kludge down. It was created as an improvement upon the previous
hard-coded constants that completely prevented anybody from making any
cust
Le Mer 17 juillet 2013 15:04, Michael Droettboom a écrit :
> This patch doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. get_name should
> work just fine if self._family is None, and indeed it does in my own
> testing:
>
> ```
> from matplotlib import font_manager
>
> f = font_manager.FontProperties(None)
Thanks Mike, it's hard to spot, but still better than nothing. Anyway,
could it be the default behaviour of plotting masked arrays (single
pixel for an isolated element)?
2013/7/17 Michael Droettboom :
> You could use a single pixel for a marker (','), I guess. But as you
> say, you need at least
10 matches
Mail list logo
