Bump for this topic; I'd still love to know what the right thing is to do
here.
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Daniel Hyams wrote:
> Hmm, I just found out that if I change path.Path.contains_point to use
> "point_on_path" instead of "point_in_path", the containment tests work
> properly. I'm
Hmm, I just found out that if I change path.Path.contains_point to use
"point_on_path" instead of "point_in_path", the containment tests work
properly. I'm not that familiar with the path code...is the difference
that one is testing for polygonal insideness, and one is testing for
literally being
I've run into a strange problem with contains() on an arrow; there is a
large area to the left of the arrow that insists that it is contained
within the arrow. Small runnable sample attached.
I've looked at the path for the arrow, and it looks fine to me. I even
went so far as to hack a STOP ont