I have experienced the same problem with IDLE.
It only works with -n, but then you lose the nice feature of 'starting
over'.
Does anybody know a fix so we can do both?
Thanks,
Mark
BTW, when you use pylab in interactive mode, the axis() command should scale
your figure interactively, also under
belinda == belinda thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
belinda I can create plots to my hearts content in both, but when
belinda I ask to rescale the plots, e.g. axis([-.2,2.4,-2,2.4]),
belinda NOTHING happens to the figure drawn via IDLE, whereas the
belinda command works as
belinda == belinda thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
belinda Hi,
belinda I've been playing w/both IDLE and IPython, using TkAgg in
belinda both cases as the back end. Also, I've got the latest
belinda matplotlib and ipython versions and am using MacPython's
belinda 2.4.4 IDLE.
Mark,
BTW, when you use pylab in interactive mode, the axis() command
should scale your figure interactively, also under IDLE. Have you
tried that?
Yes, I tried using axis in both IDLE and IPython. IPython's redrew
the axis automatically whereas IDLE's did not.
I am not sure, but I
belinda == belinda thom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
belinda I am not sure, but I think this difference in behavior is
belinda b/c IPython is a bit better about calling
belinda draw_if_interactive after most pylab functions (see
belinda Eric Firing's
Hi,
I've been playing w/both IDLE and IPython, using TkAgg in both cases
as the back end. Also, I've got the latest matplotlib and ipython
versions and am using MacPython's 2.4.4 IDLE.
It seems that if IDLE is not invoked w/the -n flag, the figures that
are drawn can often get the
