No problem!
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> > Which version of matplotlib are you running? I could have sworn this was
> > fixed awhile ago. If I understand the problem correctly, essentially, the
> > autoscalling
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Benjamin Root wrote:
> Which version of matplotlib are you running? I could have sworn this was
> fixed awhile ago. If I understand the problem correctly, essentially, the
> autoscalling was clipping empty patches out.
I'm embarrassed to say that I didn't look at
Which version of matplotlib are you running? I could have sworn this was
fixed awhile ago. If I understand the problem correctly, essentially, the
autoscalling was clipping empty patches out.
Ben Root
On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 2:57 AM, Matthew Brett
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just noticed that this:
>
>
Hi,
I just noticed that this:
>>> x = np.arange(10)
>>> y = np.zeros(10)
>>> y[5] = 1
>>> plt.bar(x, y)
Will generate a big box for x = 5 with x 0:5 and 6: stripped, whereas this:
>>> y += 0.01
>>> plt.bar(x, y)
Will generate a bar plot going from x = 0 to 9 with a bar at 5 as I
was expect
