Re: OLTC

2019-02-19 Thread Ray Zimmerman
Since the automatic control of OLTCs is not currently handled by MATPOWER's runpf() or runcpf(), you will have to implement your own handling of the tap changing. I see two overall approaches, both of which will require you to choose the specific details of the algorithm and implementation. 1.

Re: OPF - user constraints

2019-02-19 Thread Ray Zimmerman
If the user constraint is implemented correctly, it should not be possible to have a violated user-defined constraint (outside the numerical tolerances specified in opf.violation) if the OPF solves successfully. Ray > On Feb 15, 2019, at 10:36 AM, Manuel Vaz Castro > wrote: > > Hello, >

Re: Question regarding incorporating contingency in 'OPF' model

2019-02-19 Thread Ray Zimmerman
The standard OPF formulation used when you call runopf() does not include contingencies. MOST does handle contingencies in the context of a DC OPF (optionally including multiple periods and unit commitment as well). For details, please see the MOST User’s Manual

OLTC

2019-02-19 Thread Ahmad Sadiq Abubakar
Hi, How can I implement the on-load tap changer (OLTC) operation in MATPOWER runpf or runcpf? Any guide and/or suggestions is welcome.