Re: [get_losses] Different overall value for active losses

2018-12-13 Thread Ray Zimmerman
. The branch series losses and line charging reactive injections are handled separately by get_losses(). See help get_losses for details. Put the attached display_power_balance.m in your MATLAB path and try the following. Here’s what I get …>> load test_n

Re: [get_losses] Different overall value for active losses

2018-12-11 Thread José Paulos
(reactive load added by hand - the summary was rounding it to 0) However, when analyzing it "by hand" via *powerflow.bus*, we are not understanding the differences: get_losses gives us the active and reactive losses via *Active Losses* /sum(abs(real(losses)))/0.3

Re: [get_losses] Different overall value for active losses

2018-12-10 Thread Ray Zimmerman
, but in our network, we have: > > Sum of the GS Shunt Conductances = 0.0865 MW > Difference between calculated losses vs. get_losses = 0.095 MW (that were > supposedly due to the missing GS values) > Resulting a difference of 0.0085 MW (even this is different from the -0.1 MW > active

Re: [get_losses] Different overall value for active losses

2018-11-29 Thread José Paulos
of the GS Shunt Conductances = *0.0865 MW* Difference between calculated losses vs. get_losses = *0.095 MW *(that were supposedly due to the missing GS values) Resulting a difference of *0.0085 MW *(even this is different from the *-0.1 MW* active shunt injections). INESC TEC *José Paulos* Centro

Re: [get_losses] Different overall value for active losses

2018-11-27 Thread Ray Zimmerman
41 (1 REF | 1 PV) > % number of branches: 41 (8 transformers) > % number of loads: 21 (including Pd/Qd = 0) > % number of generators:2 > % number of capacitors: 2 > > We use get_lossses, in this case: > > %%% compute the losses

[get_losses] Different overall value for active losses

2018-11-27 Thread José Paulos
of branches:   41 (8 transformers) % number of loads:              21 (including Pd/Qd = 0) % number of generators:    2 % number of capacitors: 2 We use get_lossses, in this case:     %%% *compute the losses*     losses = get_losses(powerflow);     %%% *the active losses

Re: Get_losses

2017-07-17 Thread Ray Zimmerman
Actually, dloss_dV includes partials with respect to both voltage angle and voltage magnitude. But, yes, always check the help for the function in question by typing, for example, help get_losses, or by checking the online function reference Shri mentioned. Ray > On Jul 15, 2017, at

Re: Get_losses

2017-07-15 Thread Abhyankar, Shrirang G.
ctions. Suggest going through this first and then sending questions to the list if something is not clear. Here’s the reference for the get_losses<http://www.pserc.cornell.edu/matpower/docs/ref/matpower6.0/get_losses.html> function. Shri From: <bounce-121659003-73493...@list.cornell

Get_losses

2017-07-15 Thread Akash Tyagi
Hello everyone, I am trying to use get_losses command and it's quite easy but i am not getting one thing in that command, mpc=loadcase(case5); results=runpf(mpc); [loss,fchg,tchg,dloss_dv]=get_losses(results); what is 'dloss_dv' given means??