Re: Question about case9

2022-07-08 Thread Ahmad Bariq Al Fahri
Okay, thanks again for the answer. On Thu, Jul 7, 2022, 10:08 PM Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez < ce.murillosanc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ahmad Bariq Al Fahri wrote: > > Thank you Carlos for the information. > As in Case 9, all bus voltage is specified to be 345 kV. If the > transformer defaults ratio is

Re: Question about case9

2022-07-07 Thread Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez
Ahmad Bariq Al Fahri wrote: Thank you Carlos for the information.  As in Case 9, all bus voltage is specified to be 345 kV. If the transformer defaults ratio is 1:1, does it mean that the generator is connected in 345 kV

Re: Question about case9

2022-07-06 Thread Ahmad Bariq Al Fahri
Thank you Carlos for the information. As in Case 9, all bus voltage is specified to be 345 kV. If the transformer defaults ratio is 1:1, does it mean that the generator is connected in 345 kV as well? Thank you. Best regards, Ahmad On Thu, 7 Jul 2022 at 08:55, Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez < ce.muril

Re: Question about case9

2022-07-06 Thread Carlos E Murillo-Sanchez
Ahmad Bariq Al Fahri wrote: I would like to ask about case9.m (9 bus, 3 generators case) system configuration. As I know that the parameters of 'TAP' (column 9) in the branch data are set to zero, does it mean that the system does no

Question about case9

2022-07-06 Thread Ahmad Bariq Al Fahri
Dear Dr Ray, I would like to ask about case9.m (9 bus, 3 generators case) system configuration. As I know that the parameters of 'TAP' (column 9) in the branch data are set to zero, does it mean that the system does not consider transformer modelling? Is the generator directly connected to the 345