Maxime Petazzoni wrote:
...
> * XSLT processing
>
> As far as I remember, the choice of outputting XML satisfies
> everybody. The problem relates to where we'll do the XSLT
> processing. There are two main solutions :
>
> - client-side processing, as by now. The user requires a capable
> browse
Hi,
> I am still worried about the portability of client-side processing.
> Between all the versions of all the browsers, doing complicated
> things seems to be hit and miss to me.
So are we. As I said, only Gecko based browser can handle it, and I
don't believe it's good to narrow the users rang
re-send to list
On 6/27/05, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> you can make the XSLT 'standard' enough to handle both IE and firefox
> (and Safari)
> aim to do this.
>
> If you have some XSLT transform which you need and can't be done on IE, then
> we might need to fallback to mod_transform,
