Glenn:
I'm running mc with -r, but the only difference it makes
is that without -r, mc spits out an error message while
with -r it just freezes the prompt. I.e. the
difference is cosmetical, while the problem remains.
--
__
Sign-up for
Any counterarguments?
i for one got to like the esc-[0-9] on dumb(x) terminals.
a few times i think i couldn't have done without it in the past.
why change it?
--
___
Mc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
Hello!
Having committed the above to print, an examination of the source shows
that it has already been done, an extract from src/OChangeLog ...
Sat Dec 6 23:24:23 1997 Yuri Kuzmenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* main.c: added -r command-line option. It removes
The shell is already
Quoting christian laubscher [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any counterarguments?
i for one got to like the esc-[0-9] on dumb(x) terminals.
a few times i think i couldn't have done without it in the past.
I think you still can use Alt-number. The bad thing is that users cannot invoke
the menu
Maybe the delay should be an integer variable in milliseconds? Different
terminals, different connections and different users will need different delays.
So we need two ini file parameters:
esc_mode={0|1|2}
where 0 means stick forever, 1 means stick
for some time (controlled by esc_delay)
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 05:39:54AM +0100, Tomas Styblo wrote:
In my humble opinion the restore does not work over network
because the implementation is fundamentally broken.
Sorry I didn't answer earlier, but I haven't had access to computer
for nearly two weeks.
Yes, I fully agree. It was
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:58:21PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
There is no such word stat()ed. Whoever wrote that code didn't care about
users who don't know C programming. Perhaps that author of that code didn't
expect that to happen.
I would like to add that this message often shows when
Quoting Adam Byrtek 'alpha' [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 05:58:21PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
There is no such word stat()ed. Whoever wrote that code didn't care
about
users who don't know C programming. Perhaps that author of that code
didn't
expect that to happen.
I
Hello!
Sorry, but I must forward this private reply to the mailing list (except the
fancy HTML attachment that would not be interesting to the subscribers) for the
case if my plane doesn't reach the destination. I should not be the single
point of failure.
I'll appreciate if somebody with
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 03:43:07PM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
I would like to add that this message often shows when dealing with
samba shares mounted with smbmount but currently unavailable.
Again, it should be safe to treat such entries as directories.
They already *are* directories:
~%
10 matches
Mail list logo
