Re: mc 4.7.0pre3 support for .tlz archives

2009-10-27 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Paul Marwick pa...@waitrose.com wrote: Paul Hartman wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Paul Marwick pa...@waitrose.com wrote: After a bit of a hunt, I found this in /etc/mc/mc.ext # .tar.lzma, .tlz regex/\.t(ar\.lzma|lz)$ Open=%cd %p#utar

Re: mc 4.7.0pre3 support for .tlz archives

2009-10-27 Thread Paul Hartman
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Paul Marwick pa...@waitrose.com wrote: I assume that it must be an error in the way the regex is structured, but I certainly can't see it. I think the regex looks okay, but found this in util.c which looks like it may be a clue: /* HACK: we must belive to

Re: mc 4.7.0pre3 support for .tlz archives

2009-10-27 Thread Theodore Kilgore
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, /dev/rob0 wrote: On Tuesday 27 October 2009 15:16:57 Theodore Kilgore wrote: Does anyone happen to know if similar procedures will open a Slackware .txz file or not? Slackware 13's mc works fine with .txz packages. Sorry, this is on my list of things to look into,

Re: mc 4.7.0pre3 support for .tlz archives

2009-10-27 Thread Theodore Kilgore
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Helmut Hullen wrote: Hallo, Theodore, Du meintest am 27.10.09 zum Thema Re: mc 4.7.0pre3 support for .tlz archives: After a bit of a hunt, I found this in /etc/mc/mc.ext # .tar.lzma, .tlz regex/\.t(ar\.lzma|lz)$ Open=%cd %p#utar View=%view{ascii} lzma

Re: mc 4.7.0pre3 support for .tlz archives

2009-10-27 Thread paul marwick
Paul Hartman wrote: On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Paul Marwick pa...@waitrose.com wrote: I assume that it must be an error in the way the regex is structured, but I certainly can't see it. I think the regex looks okay, but found this in util.c which looks like it may be a clue: /*

Re: ncurses or slang

2009-10-27 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Slava Zanko slavaza...@gmail.com schrieb: Hi folks, snip unless there's a damn good reason for slang, I'd prefer dropping slang in favour of ncurses. cu -- - Enrico Weigelt== metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/

Re: building 4.6.2 with glib1

2009-10-27 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Gabor Z. Papp g...@papp.hu schrieb: Hi, Compiling current git with glib1 fails with the following error: you shouldn't be much surprised: glib1 and glib2 are totally different, very incompatible libraries, just happen to share the name and some ideas behind. BTW: I'm (again) working on

Re: ncurses or slang

2009-10-27 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 18:42 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: unless there's a damn good reason for slang, I'd prefer dropping slang in favour of ncurses. Why would you drop anything at all unless there's a damn good reason for that? -- Sincerely yours, Yury V. Zaytsev

Re: building 4.6.2 with glib1

2009-10-27 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 18:45 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: BTW: I'm (again) working on getting rid of it at all, since glib is utterly broken/unusable on certain platforms (especially embedded ones) Would you please elaborate on how broken it is? P.S. It would be interesting to see your repo

Re: ncurses or slang

2009-10-27 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Yury V. Zaytsev y...@shurup.com schrieb: On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 18:42 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: unless there's a damn good reason for slang, I'd prefer dropping slang in favour of ncurses. Why would you drop anything at all unless there's a damn good reason for that? To make the

Re: ncurses or slang

2009-10-27 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 20:03 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Yury V. Zaytsev y...@shurup.com schrieb: On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 18:42 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: unless there's a damn good reason for slang, I'd prefer dropping slang in favour of ncurses. Why would you drop anything at

Re: building 4.6.2 with glib1

2009-10-27 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Yury V. Zaytsev y...@shurup.com schrieb: On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 18:45 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: BTW: I'm (again) working on getting rid of it at all, since glib is utterly broken/unusable on certain platforms (especially embedded ones) Would you please elaborate on how broken it

Re: ncurses or slang

2009-10-27 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Yury V. Zaytsev y...@shurup.com schrieb: On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 20:03 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Yury V. Zaytsev y...@shurup.com schrieb: On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 18:42 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: unless there's a damn good reason for slang, I'd prefer dropping slang in favour

Re: building 4.6.2 with glib1

2009-10-27 Thread Yury V. Zaytsev
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 20:12 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Just was too lazy to reconfigure the signature for that list (because, since i'd been driven out of the team, i rarely come around here ...). My current projects are now exclusively in git repos - if you're interested in sth., just let

Re: building 4.6.2 with glib1

2009-10-27 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Yury V. Zaytsev y...@shurup.com schrieb: On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 20:12 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Just was too lazy to reconfigure the signature for that list (because, since i'd been driven out of the team, i rarely come around here ...). My current projects are now exclusively in

Re: building 4.6.2 with glib1

2009-10-27 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 27.10.2009 21:12, Enrico Weigelt wrote: Just was too lazy to reconfigure the signature for that list (because, since i'd been driven out of the team, i rarely come around here ...). My current projects are now exclusively in git repos - if you're

Re: ncurses or slang

2009-10-27 Thread Nikos Chantziaras
On 10/27/2009 07:42 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote: * Slava Zankoslavaza...@gmail.com schrieb: Hi folks, snip unless there's a damn good reason for slang, I'd prefer dropping slang in favour of ncurses. The bug in mcedit where pressing the DEL key deletes the background in ncurses should be