On 15/10/16 10:57, Mike wrote:
Regarding these 4 issues, In My Humble Opinion:
#1: - copies are made in the disk order, instead of taking the sort
order that is chosen for the display
I have wondered why this is the case myself. I can see the odd situation
I would want to preserve disk
On 14/10/16 15:35, chris glur wrote:
..the presence of very basic defects in the file
management functions.
Please describe some of these.
- copies are made in the disk order, instead of taking the sort order
that is chosen for the display
- when some of the files are allready on
On 11/10/16 12:41, chris glur wrote:
how can you LIVE with one instance of mc ?!
By using it for which NC (it's ancestor) was made:
a file/dir manager, not a terminal.
I'm amazed at the resources and time that go into the terminal
maintenance and development, and the presence of very basic
On 05/05/16 09:44, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote:
On Wed, 4 May 2016, Rikishi 42 wrote:
I know there are much more recent versions available, and multiple
bugs have been fixed. But before I go looking for a package to upgrade
my machines, I'd like to know if bugd have been solved in the file
copy
Hi, I'm using MC 4.8.1 in Linux Mint.
I know there are much more recent versions available, and multiple bugs
have been fixed. But before I go looking for a package to upgrade my
machines, I'd like to know if bugd have been solved in the file copy
progress display and the inconsistancy in the
Hi,
I've been using mc for a very, very long time now. And a while (years ?)
back there was a change in the interface of the copy progress display. I
liked that very much, but found a bug and also a need for a an
additional option.
I'm only using release 4.8.1, but didn't find anything in
