what could i specify to let it be built like before?
i manually edited the config.h file to enable crypt/shadow instead of pam;
also, i changed the makefile variable MCSERVLIBS to state -lcrypt instead
of -lpam -ldl.
surely there must be a cleaner way to achieve this. ;-)
--
On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 10:58:35AM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Can you provide a log of the build and the output of configure. It would
be best if you could put them somewhere for download instead of mailing
them to the list.
http://www.sisyphus.ch/mc/
tia,
christian
--
hi pavel,
The following line from acinclude.m4 should explain the situation better:
[...]
dnl MC_MCSERVER_CHECKS
dnlCheck how mcserver should check passwords.
dnlPossible methods are PAM, pwdauth and crypt.
dnlThe later works with both /etc/shadow and /etc/passwd.
dnlIf
On Sat, Jul 23, 2005 at 01:22:17PM -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
A new version of Midnight Commander, an easy to use console-based
file manager for Unix systems has been released, it is available from:
thank you - and congrats!
and thanks to the whole mc team.
regards,
christian
ps: how
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 02:02:34AM -0500, bulia byak wrote:
[...]
mc reports only 2147483 bytes [...]
if it was kilobytes: 2147483647==2**31-1?
[...]
35108 Kb is reported by du but 27733K is seen by mc.
Perhaps this latter case can be ascribed to different methods
of determining file sizes,
Any counterarguments?
i for one got to like the esc-[0-9] on dumb(x) terminals.
a few times i think i couldn't have done without it in the past.
why change it?
--
___
Mc mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc
On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 11:50:05AM -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote:
btw: it seems the -P parameter implementation has changed it now wants
a file name - yes, it's in the man page, but it could complicate the
upgrade for an inexperienced user with a distribution-provided mc.sh in
hi pavel!
not meaning to overly annoy you, but:
[...], I'd certainly consider moving to whatever the development team
is using.
I don't see any logic here.
there might be some merits to the way carl thinks, though:
not too long ago, you mentioned something like taking out the shadow
