Re: [PMH] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Jakub Steiner
On 23 May 2001 15:17:40 -0400, Miguel de Icaza wrote: Every will linux email clients be threatened by melissa-like worms? article ends with we have the execute bit 'security'. I vote for not having this feature implemented... You realize that this gives you no security at all right?

Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: [PMH] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-23 Thread Christian Rose
Vladimir Vukicevic wrote: Currently when people download executables from the network, say for installing software, they can not execute them because the execute bit is not set. Does this actually happen? Can anyone remember the last time they downloaded a single binary executable from

Re: [PMH] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-23 Thread Miguel de Icaza
As has been already mentioned, nautilus has a way how to change perms without launching a shell (I bet gmc has too, dunno). Of course I know this. And you do too. And yes, gmc has this as well. The problem is not that *we* know that this exists. But the problem is that I have *seen*

Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: [PMH] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-23 Thread Steven Willoughby
On 23 May 2001 14:59:31 -0700, Miles Lane wrote: It would be cool to be able to: Click on a RPM link to download the RPM file and then have an installer kick off that shows the RPM info and asks for an installation confirmation. Then, prompt for the root

Re: [Nautilus-list] Re: [PMH] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-23 Thread Miles Lane
It would be cool to be able to: Click on a RPM link to download the RPM file and then have an installer kick off that shows the RPM info and asks for an installation confirmation. Then, prompt for the root password before actually installing the package.