Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-29 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Miguel de Icaza am Mon, May 28, 2001 at 06:57:23PM -0400: With package packed as rpm, you can look what it contains. People do not `review' rpm packages, let alone review the scripts they execute. You are just as vulnerable. True. But you at least have the option. Not so

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-26 Thread Vladimir Vukicevic
On 24 May 2001 10:19:56 -0400, Eric Mitchell wrote: However, you could rig up an LD_PRELOAD shared library to handle some useful system calls (open, unlink, etc.) and even go so far as to ask for confirmation before doing anything suspicious (opening files outside current directory,

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Dan Winship
You can also send an e-mail saying `please drag the /bin directory into the trashcan and everything will work just fine'. But that message won't forward a copy of itself to everyone in your addressbook and in your corporate LDAP server. Why are you even bothering to try to argue about this?!

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Miguel de Icaza
I still don't see the utility in adding hacks into evolution to special-case this. Will the same happen with application/x-rpm? And application/x-scripting-language? I still maintain that having the user have to manually set the execute bit will at least force them to actually have to

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Zak McGregor
On Thu, 24 May 2001 13:29:43 -0700 Ben Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dan Winship wrote: Why are you even bothering to try to argue about this?! It's not like this is unexplored territory and no one knows what will happen if we try. You are proposing to give Evolution *exactly* the

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Christopher James Lahey am Thu, May 24, 2001 at 06:06:49AM -0400: That doesn't work either because then if you switch languages, you lose all your data. Well, it's in a directory that's harder to find which amounts to the same thing. Uh? Why do you lose data? I proposed that

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Tuomas Kuosmanen
On 24 May 2001 17:16:44 +0200, Zak McGregor wrote: On Thu, 24 May 2001 15:40:01 +0200 Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So sprach Tuomas Kuosmanen am Thu, May 24, 2001 at 04:06:51PM +0300: Softlinks are not fun on the shell: Exactly. However, surely the locations need to

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Tuomas Kuosmanen am Thu, May 24, 2001 at 08:46:37PM +0300: However, surely the locations need to be accessible from any app and not just from those that use gconf? Yep, the folder would be in your homedir in any case. Or somewhere you changet it yourself (if there is some

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Cory Trese
I just thought of something. Maybe we should have a property in the mime-type that describes whether this mime-type is safe to be launched or not. So we can manually tag things that might introduce a security risk. I like that idea. Perhaps we could have something like a Desktop

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Zak McGregor am Thu, May 24, 2001 at 01:40:02PM +0200: Softlinks perhaps? Removing old softlinks for languages no longer used Something just came up my mind - how often does the average user change the language, anyway? Sure, some people are multilingual, but every person has a

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-24 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Tuomas Kuosmanen am Thu, May 24, 2001 at 02:10:35PM +0300: This is Not Good(tm) since you might have something else using those files as well. Like a script, or they might be open in some application when you change it. Hmm, true. On my windows box I have both C:\Program Files and

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-23 Thread Darin Adler
On Tuesday, May 22, 2001, at 08:52 PM, Miguel de Icaza wrote: You should be able to mock up your idea by adding a simple application that is registered as the handler for elf/a.out files which does what you described. Ok, I have implemented this. I am just waiting for approval to

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-23 Thread Alexander Skwar
So sprach Christian Rose am Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:27:51PM +0200: I think that a big security warning would be appropriate when double-clicking a binary without execute permission set, though. This Dunno, but for some reason I'd think that people might just ignore this warning. People might

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-23 Thread Miguel de Icaza
There are several IRC clients that can do auto-dcc, and some default the dcc-save directory to your homedir. This is stupid. And I am sure there are users who dont understand DCC and what it is once we get more novice users to GNOME. So DCC send a .desktop file

Re: [PMH] Re: [Nautilus-list] Idea for Nautilus and GMC.

2001-05-23 Thread Miguel de Icaza
what if someone distributes a malicious elf/a.out binary as foo-1.5-2.i386.rpm the user will open the file with gmc/nautilus and instead of telling the user no viewer capable of opening this file (or whatever it says when someone runs a binary w/o the execute bit) it will set the execute