Re: Cannot submit new ticket

On Sun, 06 Dec 2015 23:18:59 +0100 "Yury V. Zaytsev" <y...@shurup.com> wrote: > On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 22:18 +0100, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > > > > > I've just registered on the mc's trac. After filling a new ticket and > > clicking on "Create

Cannot submit new ticket

Hi, I've just registered on the mc's trac. After filling a new ticket and clicking on "Create ticket" I get: "Submission rejected as potential spam (StopForumSpam says this is spam (username))". My username (ag) hasn't been rejected while registering, thus it should be considered as legal. So

Re: Cannot submit new ticket

On Mon, 7 Dec 2015 00:10:45 +0100 Andrey Gursky <andrey.gur...@e-mail.ua> wrote: > On Sun, 06 Dec 2015 23:18:59 +0100 > "Yury V. Zaytsev" <y...@shurup.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2015-12-06 at 22:18 +0100, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > > > > &

Re: Cannot submit new ticket

e closed it's free repository. I would vote for email access to bug-related things, like in debian. Also vlc developers make reviews of patches the good old way per email. Regards, Andrey [1] https://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2015-March/msg0.html > On Dec 6, 2015 6:17 PM, "

Re: Compiling mc 4.8.15

WTO, if there is one, or just wait until mc get packaged? If you still want to do it by yourself, be prepared to search through the net for some solutions for general issues, which are not mc related. Maybe there is someone on Mac here on the list, who could assist better? -- Andrey > On Sat,

Re: Help testing the pre-release of mc-4.8.18

Hi, On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 21:39:11 +0200 (CEST) "Yury V. Zaytsev" wrote: > On Tue, 27 Sep 2016, Paul Marwick wrote: > > > I can't say I was having any major problems with 4.8.17, though there > > was a second release from the Arch maintainer a few days ago with a > > couple of

Re: mc^2 news (january 2016)

On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 22:17:33 +0100 "Yury V. Zaytsev" wrote: > On a related note, I think we (or, rather, I) should start thinking > about releasing 4.8.16 sometime soon. There is quite a bit of good stuff > accumulated in master already. Yury, do you plan to close all tickets

Re: mc^2 news (january 2016)

On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 17:58:12 +0100 (CET) "Yury V. Zaytsev" <y...@shurup.com> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Feb 2016, Andrey Gursky wrote: > > > Yury, do you plan to close all tickets with milestone 4.8.16 for the > > release? > > I can't tell; if I get time, the

Re: mc^2 news (august 2016)

Hi Yury, On Thu, 18 Aug 2016 21:00:31 +0200 (CEST) "Yury V. Zaytsev" wrote: > On Thu, 18 Aug 2016, denisgolovan wrote: > [cut] > > I mean to structure those 500+ bugs/features ("future" milestone) in > > some meaningful way + put some estimates(weeks, dollars)/difficulty

Re: file timestamps not preserved

On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:55:58 +0200 Andrey Gursky wrote: > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:30:36 +0300 Nerijus Baliūnas wrote: > > > 2017-04-18 16:09, Andrey Gursky rašė: > > > Hi Nerijus, > > > > > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:33:50 +0300 Nerijus Baliunas wrote: > &

Re: file timestamps not preserved

On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:30:36 +0300 Nerijus Baliūnas wrote: > 2017-04-18 16:09, Andrey Gursky rašė: > > Hi Nerijus, > > > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:33:50 +0300 Nerijus Baliunas wrote: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> mc 4.8.19 does not preserve tim

Re: file timestamps not preserved

Hi Nerijus, On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:33:50 +0300 Nerijus Baliunas wrote: > Hello, > > mc 4.8.19 does not preserve timestamps of files, if they are copied from > tar.gz, cpio > archives. But copying from zip is OK. I've built now mc (git master) on Debian testing, entered a tar.gz archive and

[PATCH] Remove unused check in configure.ac

AC_STRUCT_ST_BLOCKS is a leftover from cleanup in 0ba019a90b3798abae32ba261e72b737dc945615 --- configure.ac | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 387110daf..ac81404f5 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -180,7 +180,6 @@

[PATCH] Initialize struct stat st_[acm]tim.tv_nsec when present

struct stat in libc for Linux kernel contains few fields more since 14+ years [1]. from bits/stat.h: struct timespec st_atim;/* Time of last access. */ struct timespec st_mtim;/* Time of last modification. */ struct timespec st_ctim;/* Time of

Re: file timestamps not preserved

On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 17:06:57 +0200 Andrey Gursky wrote: > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:55:58 +0200 Andrey Gursky wrote: > > > On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 16:30:36 +0300 Nerijus Baliūnas wrote: > > > > > 2017-04-18 16:09, Andrey Gursky rašė: > > > > Hi Nerijus, > &

Re: file timestamps not preserved

Hi Nerijus, On Fri, 5 May 2017 17:43:34 +0300 Nerijus Baliunas wrote: > On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 01:36:49 +0200 Andrey Gursky <andrey.gur...@e-mail.ua> > wrote: > > > I received the file and was able to reproduce the issue. > > I applied both patches to 4.8.19: > [PAT

Re: file timestamps not preserved

On Fri, 5 May 2017 22:20:56 +0300 Nerijus Baliunas wrote: > And one more bug report with zip/rar files: if I copy files only, > their timestamps are OK, but if I copy directories, timestamps > of files inside of them are lost. Nerijus, thanks for the report. I can reproduce this (at least with

Re: [PATCH] Remove unused check in configure.ac

06.05.2017, 19:52, "Yury V. Zaytsev" <y...@shurup.com>: On Wed, 19 Apr 2017, Andrey Gursky wrote: AC_STRUCT_ST_BLOCKS is a leftover from cleanup in 0ba019a90b3798abae32ba261e72b737dc945615 I don't understand why you're saying that this macro is unu