Hello,
Thanks, for tracking this down! I guess I was the one responsible for this
bug being introduced.
On Sun, 26 Jan 2003, Arpi wrote:
Hi,
I've scanned a TODO list and found the item -
Make find dialog more responsive - inside
After 4.6.1 on 4.6.x branch section.
But I think the
Hello, Arpi
Fixed in CVS:
2002-12-29 Andrew V. Samoilov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* extfs/rpm: Use --nosignature only if rpm supports this.
but in mc.ext it's still there:
# RPM packages (SuSE uses *.spm for source packages)
regex/\.(rpm|spm)$
Open=%cd %p#rpm
Hello!
I wrote an extfs script that allow to edit ACL and ExtAttrs on
filesystems that support it. Currently it was tested on UFS of
FreeBSD 5.0-RELEASE and Solaris 2.8 i86pc. As soon as possible
I'll try to test it on Linux as well.
Installation
mc-4.6.0-pre3
HP-UX 11.00 without X
QPK 58.5 (sep. 2002)
glib-1.2.10
config.log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
config.status.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
configure.log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
make.log.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
Hello!
Alexander Varakin wrote:
Hi,
I tried to build mc-4.6.0-pre3 on HP-UX and AIX and ran into some problems,
which I fixed, patches are attached.
I was using native c compilers on both (xlc_r from Visual Age 5.0 on AIX,
and aCC 3.31 on HP-UX) , which are more picky than gcc, so some fixes
Alexander Varakin wrote:
Hi Andrew,
I don't have access to AIX box right now, but I am sure that the build
problems in util.c are not warnings. The AIX xlc_r compiler is very
strict, so it produced errors there.
Attached hunk of your AIX patch is not clear for me:
--
Regards,
Andrew V.
The problem here is that app_text was declared as
extern const char app_text [];
in header file, and then it was defined in c file as
static const char app_text [] =
which is not consistent, so the compiler complained about this.
Alex
From: Andrew V. Samoilov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Alexander Varakin ÐÉÛÅÔ:
The problem here is that app_text was declared as
extern const char app_text [];
in header file, and then it was defined in c file as
static const char app_text [] =
which is not consistent, so the compiler complained about this.
Alex
From: Andrew V. Samoilov
Hi,
Is it possible to link with glib statically, so there will be no need to
carry glib libraries?
Thanks,
Alex
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
Hi,
Hello!
Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is
that rpm option order sensitive.
It's working fine. Thank you!
hmm.
then teh same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems,
to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed:
+# for dpkg-less
How?
From: Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Alexander Varakin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: static linking with glib
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:06:56 -0500 (EST)
Hello!
Is it possible to link with glib statically, so there will be no need to
carry glib libraries?
Hello!
Imho this thing should be cleaned up for 4.6.0, either remove numbers or
color names or at least fix the manpage to explain what are them, instead
of having examples using numbers and description using color names.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not against fixing all you have mentioned
Hi,
I agree with you, but this documentation problem is my fault. I
overlooked this when I was changing the documentation about syntax
highlighting. It won't take much time to fix.
I also meant fixing documentation.
It looks like that I'll be busy next weekend, so the real release date
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Alexander Varakin wrote:
How?
Good question :-)
Different methods I can think of:
1) Don't compile shared library if you don't have glib installed.
2) Make a directory, put a link to libglib.a there and add the directory
to LDFLAGS:
mkdir staticlibs
ln -s
On Mon, 27 Jan 2003 16:37:32 -0500 (EST) Pavel Roskin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please be assured that I do what I can to make the next release stable and
reliable. I'm not resting - I have a lot of things to do, not all of
which are related to mc, unfortunately. There is no specific problem
Hello!
Can somebody with RH 8.x distro test attached patch. I don't know is
that rpm option order sensitive.
It's working fine. Thank you!
hmm.
then the same trick (if ... then) could be used for dpkg-less systems,
to fallback to ar+tar if no dpkg installed:
Yes, except that rpm
Hi,
Thank you. The code you found is completely broken. However, your
changes don't seem to make any difference for me. Could you please send a
strange. it solved the problem completely for me, and it seems for others
too.
Your patch makes the difference when looking for filenames
Hi,
anyway that '32 files in a grpup' approach is quite lame, it would be better
to measure time, and update panel/rot.dash and return at every 0.25 seconds
or so. Or at least call is_idle() from inside do_search() after each file
and return immediately (break the 32 counter) if zero.
Maybe
18 matches
Mail list logo
