i should say first off that the syntax highlighting
cannot have a bug because i have defined the
specification as being the current implementation.
(at least as far as cooledit is concerned.)
-> this may sound stupid, but remember that many syntax
files are now written using quirks of the current
Hi Paul,
Let me explain a little more. Shouldn't:
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 18:18, Paul Sheer wrote:
> context default
> keyword whole echo brightmagenta/20
>
> context " " green/7
> keyword \\" brightgreen/15
> keyword \\' yellow/24
> keyword ' brightred/19
>
> context ' ' brightgr
Hi Paul,
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 22:28, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Ok. So if I get rid of the "exclusive" keyword this indeed works fine.
> Maybe I started from a bad example that I didn't fully understand. What
> exactly is the "exclusive" keyword supposed to accomplish? And why
> *does* the c
Hello Paul,
On Sat, 2005-04-16 at 18:18, Paul Sheer wrote:
> try:
>
> context default
> keyword whole echo brightmagenta/20
>
> context " " green/7
> keyword \\" brightgreen/15
> keyword \\' yellow/24
> keyword ' brightred/19
>
> context ' ' brightgreen/15
> keyword \\' brig
Hi all,
the GNU automake manual mentions that --enable-developer-mode is
considered deprecated. So I prepared not to misuse it for other thing
than the ones it was designed for.
The patch adds an --enable-developer-mode option to ./configure, which
enables some CFLAGS for gcc (other compilers s
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Hello,
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
extfs experts, please, take a look at this:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3899
Committed an equivalent patch.
Is there are reason not to check it on the MC_4_6_1_PRE branch ?
Done.
Roland
___
Hello,
On Sat, 16 Apr 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
> > extfs experts, please, take a look at this:
> >
> > http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3899
>
> Committed an equivalent patch.
Is there are reason not to check it on the MC_4_6_1_PRE branch ?
_
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Hello,
extfs experts, please, take a look at this:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3899
Committed an equivalent patch.
Roland
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Hello,
extfs experts, please, take a look at this:
http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?func=detailitem&item_id=3899
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Hi,
The perl.syntax file has a couple of lines like this:
keyword $_ red/orange
and this one:
keyword wholeright $+ brightgreen/PaleGreen
Have these second colour identifiers ever been used in the code? Any use
for them in the current situation or can they be removed?
Leonard.
--
mount
Hi,
In syntax.syntax there are two duplicate lines:
keyword whole linestart\[\t\s\]whole
keyword whole whole\[\t\s\]linestart brightcyan
Am I missing something about how syntax highlighting works or can these
lines be removed?
Leonard.
--
mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research
Hello list, Paul,
I've been looking at this problem a couple of weeks ago, but couldn't
come up with a solution (yet). Sadly the syntax code is not very well
documented, so although I somewhat understand what happens I can't put
my finger on the exact location of the problem. It appears the code
s
Hello Roland,
On Fri, 2005-04-15 at 21:53, Roland Illig wrote:
> Ian Zagorskih wrote:
> > Looks like mc core dumps when it cannot find "context default" section
> > in syntax file.
>
> Thanks for the bug report. I can reproduce it, and I'm working on a
> solution.
How do you propose to fix thi
13 matches
Mail list logo
