On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 22:44 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 2005-05-19 at 09:53, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> > > The best joke, IMO, is the fact that the release of MC 4.6.1 is going
> > > to happen real soon now for two and a half years.
> > >
> > that's indeed a sad joke .
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:09 +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 07:13 +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> >>- other weird system limits?
> >
> > No. In particular, I don't think we need to support Win64, where long
> > cannot hold a pointer.
>
> Why not? What's wr
Hi, Roland!
> > Also, NDEBUG is documented in glibc.info - it disables assert(). I
> > don't think it's a good idea. Failed assertions should terminate the
> > program. In my opinion, the only exception is when they are placed by
> > somebody with the purpose of understanding how the program wo
Pavel Roskin wrote:
On Wed, 2005-05-18 at 07:13 +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
- other weird system limits?
No. In particular, I don't think we need to support Win64, where long
cannot hold a pointer.
Why not? What's wrong about that?
Roland
___
Mc-devel mai
