Hi,
i must admit that I have been overly confident with the quality of the
rewritten internal viewer. I have found two bugs in the text wrap mode.
The first occurs when moving up a line or moving down a line. If the
length of the first line on the screen (excluding the newline character)
is
Morning Roland,
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 08:25, Roland Illig wrote:
i must admit that I have been overly confident with the quality of the
rewritten internal viewer. I have found two bugs in the text wrap mode.
I'm currently working on these bugs and hope they will be fixed today.
How about
Hello,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Miguel,
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:58, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
I have made a tarball of the current trunk release and fixing a
few issues in make distcheck, the question that remains is: what version
should we use?
Please
Hello,
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
We continue to use the 4.6.xx family name. I think it might be time
to change one of those numbers to identify the changes done since the
4.6.0 release in a more significant way.
I would prefer 4.7. (Just to leave the long past of 4.6.*
Hello,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
i must admit that I have been overly confident with the quality of the
rewritten internal viewer. I have found two bugs in the text wrap mode.
You have always been overly confident with the quality of your code.
Period. With your ideas and ways
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
I still wonder why you keep posting this kind of email... I can't see the
point.
The point is that until yesterday I thought the viewer contained really
close to zero bugs. That's what I also told Miguel for considering which
CVS branch to release. So now I revert that
Hello,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Roland Illig wrote:
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
I still wonder why you keep posting this kind of email... I can't see the
point.
The point is that until yesterday I thought the viewer contained really
close to zero bugs. That's what I also told Miguel for considering
Hello,
The patch fixes an issue with exit_subshell() cleaning up
internal variables even when it should not.
To reproduce:
1) Start MC with subshell support and bash as the subshell
2) Press `Ctrl + O'
3) Press `Tab'
4) Press `Ctrl + O'
5) Press `F10' and select `Yes'
6) MC will warn you
Hello Terry!
... about offering to
become the new Maintainer of the Midnight Commander
Project.
Well, Terry, I have some arguments against your offer, but
after reading your letters here I just has to say I don't need
such maintainer.
It's better have no maintainer than such person.
No,
Hello Pavel,
Tuesday, June 7, 2005, 2:30:48 PM, you wrote:
PT Hello,
PT The patch fixes an issue with exit_subshell() cleaning up
PT internal variables even when it should not.
PT To reproduce:
PT 1) Start MC with subshell support and bash as the subshell
PT 2) Press `Ctrl + O'
PT 3) Press
Hello,
Please use MC_4_6_1_PRE for the release of 4.6.1. Then we can use HEAD
for 4.6.2 and onwards.
I second that.
Sounds good.
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Hello,
I have made a tarball of the current trunk release and fixing a
few issues in make distcheck, the question that remains is: what version
should we use?
What did you fix?
Make distcheck was broken, look at the dist-hook target, it would not
build with VPATH/different prefixes.
Hi, all!
I've updated my keybindings patch to work with latest CVS.
new stuff: label text command could be changed see cooledit.bindings for example
--
Vitja Makarov
mcedit-keys.tar.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
___
Mc-devel mailing list
hello,
I have a tarball made from the branch:
http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/mc/tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
I can rename this to 4.6.1 if people want.
Miguel.
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Hello,
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
hello,
I have a tarball made from the branch:
http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/mc/tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
The right link is:
http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/mc/mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
Hello Miguel,
Tuesday, June 7, 2005, 5:10:03 PM, you wrote:
MdI I have a tarball made from the branch:
MdIhttp://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/mc/tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
MdI I can rename this to 4.6.1 if people want.
Miguel, Why 4.6.1-pre5a, not pre4a?
Please wait before renaming
I just backported the X11 connection handling from the HEAD branch to
the MC_4_6_1_PRE branch. This fixes the so-called OpenSSH bug.
Roland
___
Mc-devel mailing list
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel
Hello Leonard, mc-devel,
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 23:34 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Hello Miguel,
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 22:58, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
I have made a tarball of the current trunk release and fixing a
few issues in make distcheck, the question that remains is: what
Jindrich Novy wrote:
--- mc-4.6.1a/src/widget.c.fixes2005-06-06 15:08:52.202559824 +0200
+++ mc-4.6.1a/src/widget.c 2005-06-06 15:08:29.120068896 +0200
@@ -2363,7 +2363,7 @@ buttonbar_set_label_data (Dlg_head *h, i
void
buttonbar_set_label (Dlg_head *h, int idx, const char *text,
On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 20:02, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Before releasing 4.6.1 there are a few things to be done:
- Backporting gcc-4 signedness fixes
I understand many of the developers doubt the quality of the warnings
from gcc-4, and hence the fixes proski created for them. We can look at
wget http://primates.ximian.com/~miguel/mc/tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
--14:28:46--
http://primates.ximian.com/%7Emiguel/mc/tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz
= `tar.mc-4.6.1-pre5a.tar.gz'
Resolving primates.ximian.com... 130.57.169.34
Connecting to primates.ximian.com[130.57.169.34]:80...
Hello!
Sorry, I should have answered this long ago.
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 05:58 -0700, Fudoki wrote:
Greetings All!
My name is Terry Wilkinson and I am on the Docs
Team and also am the Public Relations Coordinator for
the Krusader File Manager Project
Fudoki Wilkinson wrote:
Roland must be Mr. Icaza's protege, just slinging abuse and saying no
before the offer is even on the table;
In my opinion the offer of taking over mc could not have been expressed
more clearly. I had already been on the table when I said no. The
latest statement from
From - Thu Jun 2 20:53:04 2005X-Account-Key: account1X-UIDL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]X-Mozilla-Status: 0013X-Mozilla-Status2: Return-Path:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Received: from ibm46aec.bellsouth.net ([64.105.159.118]) by
imf12aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello, Terry!Now I see you actually understand me better than many mc contributorsand better than I initially thought. Maybe I was too harsh in myinitial e-mail. There was a significant fallout in my inbox caused by
the recent discussions, and I had to deal with it while being verypressed with
Fudoki Wilkinson wrote:
On 6/7/05, Roland Illig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fudoki Wilkinson wrote:
mainly due to his private notes to our Marketing Manager blasting the
MC Project and it's Maintainers.
private notes? I only wrote mails to public mailing lists, mc-devel in
particular. So this
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
Roland fixed a memory leak in HEAD but he doesn't know where again g.
I have thoroughly check the changes to mcedit, where I assumed the
memory leak to have been. The only things I found were two instances
where I had replaced use of the catstrs() function with
This bug is perhaps the oldest one I could find. Well, to be honest, it
wasn't me but the SunPro compiler:
/tmp/mc-current-build/src/src/achown.c, line 517:
warning: enum type mismatch: arg #2
It's not only gcc's job to emit warnings ... ;)
Roland
Index: achown.c
Part 1 of 2-- Forwarded message --From: Fudoki Wilkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 7, 2005 9:50 PMSubject: Re: New Maintainer for MC ProjectTo: MC Devel List mc-devel@gnome.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pavel,
Below is your note posted today. Below that the full
text of the letter,
On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 02:45:32AM +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
- advanced_chown_callback (h, KEY_RIGHT, DLG_KEY);
+ advanced_chown_callback (h, DLG_KEY, KEY_RIGHT);
heh, wow ...
another a good example of why #define is bad and enum is good - provided
you have a sufficiently
30 matches
Mail list logo
