Re: [BUG] Segmentation fault when copy symlink with checked Stable Symlinks

2005-09-17 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Jindrich, On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:07 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: - my_second = resolve_symlinks (second); - if (my_second == NULL) { - g_free (my_first); + if (my_second == NULL) return buf; - } Why do you drop the

Re: [BUG] Segmentation fault when copy symlink with checked Stable Symlinks

2005-09-17 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Jindrich, On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:07 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: The attached patch fixes two nasty bugs in file.c and util.c. Could you please supply fixes for different issues in different patches? Thanks. Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Re: [BUG] Segmentation fault when copy symlink with checked Stable Symlinks

2005-09-17 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi, On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 12:48 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi Jindrich, On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:07 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: - my_second = resolve_symlinks (second); - if (my_second == NULL) { - g_free (my_first); + if

Re: [BUG] Segmentation fault when copy symlink with checked Stable Symlinks

2005-09-17 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Jindrich, On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:07 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: The attached patch fixes two nasty bugs in file.c and util.c. Split in two, cleaned up, and committed both. Thanks. Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Re: [BUG] Segmentation fault when copy symlink with checked Stable Symlinks

2005-09-17 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hi Leonard, On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 12:59 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi, On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 12:48 +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi Jindrich, On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 13:07 +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote: - my_second = resolve_symlinks (second); - if

Re: [PATCH] do_execute() flush stdout before executing a command

2005-09-17 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hello Pavel, On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 21:46 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: * execute.c (do_execute): Flush stdout after printing the command to be executed. Committed. Thanks. Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research ___

Re: [PATCH] do_execute() flush stdout before executing a command

2005-09-17 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hello Pavel, On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 21:46 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: * execute.c (do_execute): Flush stdout after printing the command to be executed. Committed. Thanks. Oh. Finally.

Re: [PATCH] do_execute() flush stdout before executing a command

2005-09-17 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Pavel, On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 15:21 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Committed. Thanks. Oh. Finally. LOL. You are so predictable. You forgot the thank you part ;-p . Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Re: [PATCH] do_execute() flush stdout before executing a command

2005-09-17 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Hi Pavel, On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 15:21 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Committed. Thanks. Oh. Finally. LOL. You are so predictable. Sure. So are you - I succesfully predicted

Re: [PATCH] do_execute() flush stdout before executing a command

2005-09-17 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Pavel, On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 16:31 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 15:21 +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Committed. Thanks. Oh. Finally. In dutch we call this kind

Re: [PATCH] do_execute() flush stdout before executing a command

2005-09-17 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello, On Sat, 17 Sep 2005, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: Sure. So are you - I succesfully predicted that it will take ages to review this patch. You forgot the thank you part ;-p . I don't have to thank anyone. You are correct. The point is you do the opposite. No reaction would