Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Roland, On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 23:17 +0100, Roland Illig wrote: > If you insist on this fix, please put the "0 &&" at the beginning of the > line. Otherwise it's likely to be missed. Please do :) > Do you really think they will fix it? Well who knows. I've subscribed to the slang user list,

Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Roland Illig
Leonard den Ottolander wrote: AFAICT it's not unusual to fix such issues with a minimal diff. If you insist on this fix, please put the "0 &&" at the beginning of the line. Otherwise it's likely to be missed. I could remove the entire block, but I might just wait for this to be fixed upstre

Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Jindrich, On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 22:22 +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote: > __libc_enable_secure is not a function, but int. Oops. Fixed the Changelog. > The fix: > http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/mc/mc/slang/slcommon.c.diff?r1=1.1&r2=1.2 > that is done is a bad hack that just confuses a read

Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Jindrich, On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 22:07 +0100, Jindrich Novy wrote: > The __libc_enable_secure usage in slcommon.c is easy to fix as there's a > sufficient workaround present in the code I've already committed a similar patch. But thanks anyway. Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genet

Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hi Leonard, On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 21:53 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Pavel, list, > > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 14:22 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > "nm mc" shows that the only symbol from GLIBC_PRIVATE is > > __libc_enable_secure. Search for __libc_enable_secure finds it in two > > pla

Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Jindrich Novy
Hello Leonard, Pavel, On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 21:05 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 14:22 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > > "nm mc" shows that the only symbol from GLIBC_PRIVATE is > > __libc_enable_secure. Search for __libc_enable_secure finds it in two > >

Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Pavel, list, On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 14:22 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > "nm mc" shows that the only symbol from GLIBC_PRIVATE is > __libc_enable_secure. Search for __libc_enable_secure finds it in two > places: > > intl/dcigettext.c - it's only used if that file is compiled as part of > libc, w

Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 21:05 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > He he. I see the same issue indeed exists with my 2005-11-10 CVS > checkout + slang2. Any suggestions on how to fix this? You are going the right thing :-) Ask S-Lang developers. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin ___

Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Pavel, On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 14:22 -0500, Pavel Roskin wrote: > "nm mc" shows that the only symbol from GLIBC_PRIVATE is > __libc_enable_secure. Search for __libc_enable_secure finds it in two > places: > > intl/dcigettext.c - it's only used if that file is compiled as part of > libc, which i

Re: Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Pavel Roskin
On Tue, 2005-11-15 at 18:30 +0100, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hi Pavel, > > I assume this is caused by one of the recent changes you've made. I > haven't seen this ever before. Installing an rpm build from a > distchecked tarball from a few days ago fails with the following error: > > $ sudo

[bug #11652] ssh transfer (shell link) corrupts files

2005-11-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Update of bug #11652 (project mc): Status: Need Info => Invalid Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #13: Ok, closing then.

Depency on ld-linux.so.2(GLIBC_PRIVATE)

2005-11-15 Thread Leonard den Ottolander
Hi Pavel, I assume this is caused by one of the recent changes you've made. I haven't seen this ever before. Installing an rpm build from a distchecked tarball from a few days ago fails with the following error: $ sudo rpm -Fv /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/mc-4.6.1a-1.lj.i386.rpm Password: error: Fa

[bug #11652] ssh transfer (shell link) corrupts files

2005-11-15 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #11, bug #11652 (project mc): but, after install http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/Linux/utils/file/managers/mc/mc-4.6.1.tar.gz don`t stoping > size over 20GB!!! ___ Reply to this item at:

[bug #11652] ssh transfer (shell link) corrupts files

2005-11-15 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #11652 (project mc): after clear and rebuild mc-4.6.1 - all working correct (but slowly) Thank You. ___ Reply to this item at: ___

[bug #11652] ssh transfer (shell link) corrupts files

2005-11-15 Thread anonymous
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #11652 (project mc): http://ftp6.tw.freebsd.org/ports/packages/shells/mc-4.6.1_3.tbz original size 122209302 download size 122208790 ___ Reply to this item at: