Follow-up Comment #3, bug #13726 (project mc):
Any comments ? Should we close this one ?
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=13726
___
Message
Update of bug #13549 (project mc):
Status:None = Confirmed
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=13549
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #13726 (project mc):
huh, i thought i already replied to this ...
no, i don't want it closed. i never had the problem of input for the shell
going to the panels. i don't know whether this was just a usage pattern thing
or whether the problem was specific to cygwin.
in
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #13726 (project mc):
Have you read the discussion to which I pointed you in comment #2 ?
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=13726
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #9631 (project mc):
Btw what about the wordprocessor mode ? It would still keep indenting the old
way...
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=9631
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #9631 (project mc):
I think this patch is reasonable. In fact the old implementation is very
questionable. I'll commit your patch if you (and anyone interested) help me a
little. First of all I am not sure which variant of your patch would be best.
I think it is worth
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #9631 (project mc):
re wordprocessor mode: i have no idea. i tried dynamic paragraphing and it
behaved exactly like no wrap at all. typewriter did no indentation at all,
so it seems to be unaffected.
___
Reply
Follow-up Comment #11, bug #9631 (project mc):
what _exact_ option set should i choose to see the mode in question? what
would be an appropriate text layout for a demo?
from what i've seen so far, i'd say leave the rest alone - because i
haven't seen anything special.
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #9631 (project mc):
i for one would commit the patch as is. the creation of whitespace-only lines
is already annoying enough as it is (the currently enabled variant of my patch
does not change it in any direction). enabling the other variant would be a
regression in
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #9631 (project mc):
Btw I am missing the changelog for your patch.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=9631
___
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #9631 (project mc):
Your patch doesn't affect wordprocessing mode. I was asking whether we should
change indentation in wordprocessing mode to reflect the changes introduced
with your patch ?
___
Reply to this
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #13726 (project mc):
sorry, i skimmed it only. corrected now.
the answer i gave in one of the related threads was along the lines of then
at least don't purge in the case of switched off panels. i think this
behaviour would be not only a quick fix, but would actually
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #13726 (project mc):
Ok, I'll reread the whole thread in the next few days (maybe next week even)
to refresh my memory and will try to find a solution .
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #13549 (project mc):
The attached patch should fix problem number 1. As for problem number two I
cannot reproduce it with latest MC so unless someone can reproduce it I'll
consider it to be fixed.
If noone objects I'll commit the patch in 2-3 days.
Update of bug #13549 (project mc):
Status: Confirmed = Ready For Test
___
Reply to this item at:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitemitem_id=13549
Follow-up Comment #13, bug #9631 (project mc):
Oswald, if you agree I'll commit the attached (slightly changed) patch once
you submit the changelog entry.
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: edit_auto_indent.patch Size:1
Follow-up Comment #14, bug #9631 (project mc):
the patch seems ok - i guess the p != 0 assertion can be safely made. :)
regarding the log: this is exactly the kind of nitpicking i think you should
not do. doing it yourself this time and adding a hint next time please
submit a ChangeLog entry
Follow-up Comment #15, bug #9631 (project mc):
You got it wrong this time - I am not doing it because I am pedantic or
because I am lazy. I am doing it because I just cannot explain it properly in
words. As you can see here:
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/mc-devel/2006-January/msg00053.html
I
Follow-up Comment #16, bug #9631 (project mc):
I've commited Oswald's patch. Thanks, Oswald!
However, before closing this bug report as fixed I'd like to hear a word from
Jozef Behran. So, Jozef, if you are reading this, please, give mcedit from cvs
a try.
Follow-up Comment #17, bug #9631 (project mc):
ah, ok, sorry then. i'm always forgetting that people might have even bigger
problems finding the right words than me. :}
thanks for committing. :-)
___
Reply to this item at:
20 matches
Mail list logo
