On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:27:42PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Arpad Biro wrote:
> >
> > > > > /mask things in the current (/) directory
> > > > > mask/ or /mask/ only directories (path has '/' ending) here
> > > > > mask
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 04:27:42PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Arpad Biro wrote:
>
> > > > /mask things in the current (/) directory
> > > > mask/ or /mask/ only directories (path has '/' ending) here
> > > > maskfiles (old behaviour)
> > >
> > > To me it is not obvi
Update of bug #13549 (project mc):
Open/Closed:Open => Closed
___
Follow-up Comment #5:
Ok, closing.
Pavel, you should now be able to close these reports yourself. Hope you could
do that
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #13549 (project mc):
Thank you for the patch for the first problem! I cannot verify it right now -
I'm using binary Midnight Commander from Debain 3.1. I hope very much to see
in the next relase.
As of the second problem - I cannot reproduce it, too, in the current ver
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Arpad Biro wrote:
> > > /mask things in the current (/) directory
> > > mask/ or /mask/ only directories (path has '/' ending) here
> > > maskfiles (old behaviour)
> >
> > To me it is not obvious. When I see `/' I think root directory.
> > Anyway, this is just me. Wha
Hi,
> > /mask things in the current (/) directory
> > mask/ or /mask/ only directories (path has '/' ending) here
> > maskfiles (old behaviour)
>
> To me it is not obvious. When I see `/' I think root directory.
> Anyway, this is just me. What worries me most is the fact that
> this patc
On Friday 2006-February-10 06:40, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> Btw, Roland, your message reminded me why I got annoyed reading this
> list in the first place.
Please, do not let it get to you. The tone here has dramatically
improved IMO, and that is mostly attributable to you and your recent
excellent
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Egmont Koblinger wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>
> > No it wasn't - bug reports do not go to the developers list. They go
> > either in bugzilla or the mc users list. The developers list is a list
> > where the development of MC is disc
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 02:33:04PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> No it wasn't - bug reports do not go to the developers list. They go
> either in bugzilla or the mc users list. The developers list is a list
> where the development of MC is discussed.
Really? Then this needs to be fixed in the READ
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pavel Tsekov Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 6:40 AM
To: Roland Illig
Cc: mc@gnome.org; MC Devel
Subject: Re: ``ctime''
[snip]
> Btw, Roland, your message reminded me why I got annoyed reading this
> list in t
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Roland Illig wrote:
> Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>We stumbled over this on IRC as a guy asked how to set the ``creation
> >>>time'' for a file, and after a while we found out he's using MC.
> >>>
> >>>MC talks of ctime as it wa
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Roland Illig wrote:
> Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> >
> >
> >>>We stumbled over this on IRC as a guy asked how to set the ``creation
> >>>time'' for a file, and after a while we found out he's using MC.
> >>>
> >>>MC talks of ctime as it wa
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
We stumbled over this on IRC as a guy asked how to set the ``creation
time'' for a file, and after a while we found out he's using MC.
MC talks of ctime as it was creation time. Is there a specific reason
for that? I searched manpag
13 matches
Mail list logo
