Re: Makeing the subshell reliable

2006-07-19 Thread Arpad Biro
Hi, Pavel Tsekov wrote: I also don't remember having major trouble with the subshell myself but then there are enough records in this mailing list and in other places which testify that the subshell is causing a lot of confusion. A lot of efforts were thrown in an attempt to solve the

[patch #5221] fix for several iso9660 charset problems

2006-07-19 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Update of patch #5221 (project mc): Category:None = VFS Status:None = Done Open/Closed:Open = Closed

Re: mc-2006-07-12-22 bug report

2006-07-19 Thread Pavel Tsekov
Hello enrico, On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, enrico wrote: Il giorno mar, 18/07/2006 alle 16.21 +0300, Pavel Tsekov ha scritto: Enrico, would you mind revealing further details on the the ftp server setup this is the command into hotlist /#ftp:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/WA and

Re: Makeing the subshell reliable

2006-07-19 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: the second variant would be embedding the real shell prompt into the panels. this could work by presenting the shell a really tiny pty. to Could you elaborate, please ? Do you mean implementing another view for the panels that will display the

Re: mc-2006-07-12-22 bug report

2006-07-19 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Wed, 19 Jul 2006, enrico wrote: Il giorno mer, 19/07/2006 alle 15.46 +0300, Pavel Tsekov ha scritto: Could you start MC with ftp logging enabled and make it crash then send the log to the list. [...] CWD / 550 /: Permission denied CWD /

Re: mc-2006-07-12-22 bug report

2006-07-19 Thread enrico
Il giorno mer, 19/07/2006 alle 15.46 +0300, Pavel Tsekov ha scritto: Could you start MC with ftp logging enabled and make it crash then send the log to the list. 220 ProFTPD 1.2.10 Server (ProFTPD) [172.24.3.120] MC -- remote_is_amiga = 0 USER salvo1024 331 Password required for

Re: Makeing the subshell reliable

2006-07-19 Thread Oswald Buddenhagen
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 04:58:16PM +0300, Pavel Tsekov wrote: On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: Shall we keep the prompt in this case ? i think it would be logical. But then we shall face the same problems. I mean it is not different from what we do now. The only difference