On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 07:17:08PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> Hmm.. I am not convinced that this patch is necessary. Why do you want
> the symlink to have an extension ? Who handles the symlinks on OS/2 ?
> Are you using some kind of a Linux/Unix emulator for OS/2 or you just
> have a set of GNU
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Pavel,
>
> On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 17:10 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
>>> This is patch which makes subshell_name_quote() use the printf
>>> utility instead of echo. Please, test it and let me know wh
Update of bug #13740 (project mc):
Severity: 3 - Normal => 1 - Wish
Summary: syntax highlighting in viewer wanted => [RFE]
syntax highlighting in viewer wanted
___
Reply to this
Hello Pavel,
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 17:10 +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
> > This is patch which makes subshell_name_quote() use the printf
> > utility instead of echo. Please, test it and let me know whether
> > to commit it.
>
> Did anyone test this patch ?
Update of bug #19245 (project mc):
Category:None => Viewer
Severity: 3 - Normal => 1 - Wish
Status:None => Duplicate
Open/Closed: