Hi Jindrich, thanks for your mehodology hints... I'll keep it in my mind. To your question. I'd prefer to have '<' ... '>' highlightment mainly for c++ code (nested templates ...). You're right that nowadays C code doesn't require that, but are we sure that for instance function templates feature aren't going to be available in C ?
We may think about conditioning this feature, but it requires bigger changes to CoolEdit used in MC. Kind Regards, Frantisek > ------------ Puvodni zprava ------------ > Od: Jindrich Novy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Predmet: Re: mc editor small changes III - unified diff > Datum: 13.8.2005 12:45:59 > ---------------------------------------- > Hello Frantisek, > > On Thu, 2005-08-11 at 09:07 +0200, František Řezníček wrote: > > here are the changes (just unified diff) : > Please send the patch as an attachment for the next time, it makes > extraction of it less painful. > > > # Should I use the latest nighbuild and incorporate the changes there or you > can > > # do it? > The best is probably to send here a ported patch to one of the latest > releases as it's likely that the patch will be applied smoothly to HEAD. > > > # Could I hope to have these minor changes in the official mc? > I modified the patch a bit so that it looks bit better now. Please avoid > shipping commented-out code within the patch. > > The question is whether highlighting of '<' and '>' is desirable in all > cases. Highlighting of such characters doesn't make too much sense when > editing C source files for instance. > > mc-devel, what's your opition on this? Yes/No? > > Attaching the updated patch -> applies smoothly to 4.6.1. > > Best, > Jindrich > > -- > Jindrich Novy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/ > (o_ _o) > //\ The worst evil in the world is refusal to think. //\ > V_/_ _\_V > > > > _______________________________________________ Mc-devel mailing list http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/mc-devel