Re: Further Midnight Commander development

2008-12-26 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Weigelt wrote: I think the most important is to have official tree as global reference and release point. Everyone else should work relative to the lastest official release and submit his patches against it. These patches should go to

Re: Further Midnight Commander development

2008-12-26 Thread Slava Zanko
Enrico Weigelt wrote: Ops... sorry my mistake: - - Stable branch will contain all founded patches (Fedora, Debian/Ubuntu, - - Current branch will contain all founded patches (Fedora, Debian/Ubuntu, Gentoo,...), new ideas and features. Fixed. :) ___

Re: Tree-Maintenance: current/devel

2008-12-26 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Enrico Weigelt wrote: is anyone already maintaining the current development tree (becoming 4.6.2) ? Enrico, please don't hurry. Wait please a few days (may be, after

Re: Further Midnight Commander development

2008-12-22 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Winnertz wrote: It's updated automatically. It can be just cloned for further development. I took care to provide full names of all committers ever committing anything to the mc repository. Yes.. this would be great. Would it be

Re: Further Midnight Commander development

2008-12-22 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Winnertz wrote: Well,, this should be quite easy. Have a look on the git-svn tool. You should be able to create a git checkout from your svn stuff.. After this it's very easy to pick each commit and apply it on the new git repro. This

Re: Further Midnight Commander development

2008-12-22 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Winnertz wrote: If yes I'll set up a trac on my private server until I find a better solution. If this repro is ready I'll ping you and we can start to migrate you patches into the git repro. Is this okay for you (and the rest of the

Re: Further Midnight Commander development

2008-12-18 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Patrick Winnertz wrote: Well, As I see there are plenty of people who would like to work further on mc, it would be very sad if these people will work on different versions, as this is ineffective, and tend to end in even more dead projects.

Re: What's happening at MC's headquarters

2008-12-17 Thread Slava Zanko
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marcel Pol wrote: I'm wondering what the state of MC is and where it's going. There were plans of a new release, but apparently it's not really happening yet. Also, I don't see many developers around anymore. I'm wondering how many active

Further Midnight Commander development

2008-12-17 Thread Slava Zanko
will Forque, which we hope will develop further. We want to see MC very comfortable and pleasant, not as it is now. Best regards, Alex Custov Andrew Savchenko Denis Frolov Dmitry Korzhevin Pavel Vasil'ev Slava Zanko http://mc.redhat-club.org -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9

Re: [bug #24986] crash at startup because of using uninitialized variable

2008-12-02 Thread Slava Zanko
Zdenek Sojka wrote: mc crashes at startup (SIGSEGV) on my system after uninitialized variable is passed to tgetstr() in tty.c : 230. Initializing that variable to NULL fixes the problem for me. I will provide any further info if needed. Attached - patch and showcase (forcing non-NULL

<    1   2