* Oswald Buddenhagen (o...@kde.org) [20090111 23:56]:
why? wouldn't AM_GNU_GETTEXT and possibly gettextize take care of everything?
AFAIK running gettextize or autoreconf won't remove an existing intl subdir.
Philipp
___
Mc-devel mailing list
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:28:34PM +0100, Philipp Thomas wrote:
* Oswald Buddenhagen (o...@kde.org) [20090111 23:56]:
why? wouldn't AM_GNU_GETTEXT and possibly gettextize take care of
everything?
AFAIK running gettextize or autoreconf won't remove an existing intl subdir.
so ...?
#145: update m4/* files
+---
Reporter: Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major |
#145: update m4/* files
+---
Reporter: Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de | Owner:
Type: enhancement| Status: new
Priority: major |
#145: update m4/* files
+---
Reporter: Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de | Owner: metux
Type: enhancement| Status: accepted
Priority: major |
#145: update m4/* files
+---
Reporter: Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de | Owner: metux
Type: enhancement| Status: accepted
Priority: major
* MC Ticket System tick...@midnight-commander.org schrieb:
actually, it is generally considered bad practice to have generated files
under version control at all. anything created by the bootstrap process
(autogen.sh) should be purged from the tree.
ACK, but that fact might change by the
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:40:27PM +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* MC Ticket System tick...@midnight-commander.org schrieb:
actually, it is generally considered bad practice to have generated files
under version control at all. anything created by the bootstrap process
(autogen.sh)
#145: update m4/* files
---+
Reporter: Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
#145: update m4/* files
+---
Reporter: Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major |
10 matches
Mail list logo
