#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
--+-
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner:
Type: defect| Status: new
#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
---+
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner: metux
Type: defect| Status:
#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
---+
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner: metux
Type: defect| Status:
#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
---+
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner: metux
Type: defect|
#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
---+
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner: metux
Type: defect
#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
---+
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner: metux
Type: defect|
#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
---+
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner: metux
Type: defect|
#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
---+
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner: metux
Type: defect|
#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
---+
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner: metux
Type: defect|
#239: double declaration of bool false and true (conflicting with stdbool.h)
---+
Reporter: Patrick Winnertz win...@debian.org | Owner: metux
Type: defect|
On Thursday 2009-02-05 23:39, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2009 at 03:05:57PM -, Ticket System wrote:
As winnie already said, stdbool.h is part of the C99 spec,
this - just like the reliance on snprintf - seems to be another
successful attempt to make mc unusable on older
11 matches
Mail list logo
